Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It
National Review ^ | 11/25/2015 | Joel Gehrke

Posted on 11/25/2015 7:20:45 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Blood of Tyrants
In other words it is a total capitulation by Obama.
Enabled by all the dimwit Senators, including the pretend conservative Ted Cruz, that signed onto the Corker bill.
41 posted on 11/25/2015 8:33:25 AM PST by lewislynn ( Ted Cruz will never be elected President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
In other words it is a total capitulation by Obama.

Not really, it is conspiracy but I prefer the word treason.

42 posted on 11/25/2015 8:46:57 AM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

This is one of the worst deals the US has ever entered into. Yet the Dems and the MSM pretend its the best thing since sliced bread. Yet another example of how this country is being run by the wrong people.


43 posted on 11/25/2015 9:11:27 AM PST by rbg81 (is pr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is no treaty because nothing’s ever been submitted to the Senate. There was supposedly a (therefore non-binding- on USA) “agreement” but now we learn nobody ever signed anything in Teheran so that if any such “agreement” ever existed neither side “agreed” or committed to obey it. Which is, of course, what the Iranians have asserted in both word and deed ever since the three anti-Magi Obama/Kerry/Jarrett proclaimed they’d given birth to some sort of wonderous new messianic age by following this star backwards to Persia. The Iranian islamonazis continue to build their nuclear bomb strike force/infrastructure - and icbm’s to deliver their bombs to their Great Satan USA - and the only visible change resulting from all of obamaKerry’s BS is that Obama has enabled his Iranian islamonazi friends to get their hands on an additional $150 Billion which will undoubtably further propel Iran’s war making efforts both in the nuclear bomb factories and on the ground through Irans massive exporting of terrorist murder gangs like Isis and Hezbollah etc etc. but there’s no treaty and no deal binding on anyone so Congress can, once again, stick its head in a toilet ( already accomplished with the treasonous and blatantly unconstitutional corker bill). Another victory for the enemy within (Obama) and the enemy without (worldwide islamonazi terrorism and militarization against infidels like America Europe etc). Score: Obama 1, America -10.


44 posted on 11/25/2015 9:17:28 AM PST by faithhopecharity (Brilliant, funny, and incisive Tagline coming to this space soon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

The utter stupidity of the deal is so obvious.

I am not getting what the admin is saying here.

“We secured an incredible, legacy-building deal with our arch enemy and potentially stopped an existential threat in its tracks.”

“But don’t worry, Iran didn’t sign it so it’s not actually a deal”.

This is like you can keep your doctor if you like your doctor and I’ll STILL save you $2500 a year.

This is a mind control technique that is seriously losing its luster even among *some* of the hard-wired: To impose and or promulgate completely opposite ideas and continue to insist that both ideas are perfectly compatible. And indeed, being able to bring those ideas into simultaneous consideration and have them hang there, floating, without obliterating each other like matter and anti-matter, is a sign of blazing sophistication. It happens everywhere.

I actually like anti-natter!


45 posted on 11/25/2015 9:26:25 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Long sentences but you completely nailed it.


46 posted on 11/25/2015 9:28:04 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity; SeekAndFind

Exactly.

Even had they signed the deal, there was really no commitment on their part. Any weapons systems were off limits to inspectors. Only civilian facilities were to be inspected... but only Iranians were allowed to inspect them. And only with a month’s notice.

In other words, meaningless on their part.

On our part, we agreed to protect and defend their facilities from attack, and give them $150 or $160 billion dollars. In effect, we will protect and pay for their weapons program.

Thats if they signed. They didn’t sign, but we will keep our part of the bargain anyway at least while Obama or any Dem or GOPe is in the White House.

Iran has already informed us that, while they will not sign, if we don’t keep our side of the agreement its an act of war. And they continue to be at war with us even if we do keep our side of the bargain.


47 posted on 11/25/2015 10:49:10 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Liz; AT7Saluki

48 posted on 11/29/2015 9:36:07 AM PST by Libloather (Embrace the suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson