Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sparklite2
if it took an amendment to the Constitution to criminalize the use and distribution of alcohol, how was it sufficient to do the same to marijuana without another amendment?

Big-government "conservatives" have signed on to the FDR court's perversion of the Commerce Clause via "substantial effects."

23 posted on 11/27/2015 1:07:56 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

The Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 banned its use and sale.

Yet, as one might hope, the Tax Act was ruled unconstitutional a few years later. What followed in the 1970s was the Controlled Substances Act.

Marijuana was “temporarily” put under Schedule One of the CSA while Nixon had a committee study the issue.

“The Schafer Commission, as it was called, declared that marijuana should not be in Schedule I and even doubted its designation as an illicit substance. However, Nixon discounted the recommendations of the commission, and marijuana remains a Schedule I substance.”

http://www.drugpolicy.org/blog/how-did-marijuana-become-illegal-first-place


30 posted on 11/27/2015 1:26:33 PM PST by sparklite2 (Islam = all bathwater, no baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson