Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

I suppose the real question should be: “Why is any critical comment or information of Islam widely and vigorously denied to the point of changing data from the past”

I suppose the answer is: “Somebody is paying for this sort of influence”

I suppose as the Saudis run out of money, they won’t be able to continue to pay for the sort of influence that gets American Presidents to declare a “religion of peace” immediately after massive terror attacks, or to get the media to walk in lockstep when something pops out of the memory hole that is critical of islam.

The Saudis probably laughed at how little it costs to control politicians and the press in the US and influence public opinion and the winds of political correctness to protect the reputation of islam.


12 posted on 11/30/2015 10:27:46 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RFEngineer

Elsewhere there was another news story about Yassir Arafat holding a Palestinian news cameraman working for a major news network as a hostage with the demand that the news network not broadcast any videos of Muslims celebrating the 9/11 attacks or else the hostage would be killed.


15 posted on 11/30/2015 10:49:13 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: RFEngineer

We know how close the Bush family was to true Saudis, how close the whole oil industry was. Is. Now we seen how Big Oil sees the chance to push back by allowing the exportation of surplus oil since the Gulf States have opened their taps to keep their share of the market. and their revenues up.


20 posted on 11/30/2015 11:32:40 PM PST by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson