Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hattend

I imagine that the level of stealth/ profile that they are going for would preclude the need for maneuverability.

Not saying that is the case, nor agreeing with the logic, but I am going to assume their are enough former military pilots on the payroll at Lockheed that this had to have come up.


10 posted on 12/13/2015 4:21:06 AM PST by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: risen_feenix

And o course I mean Northrup, not Lockheed. Lol.

Or do I?


11 posted on 12/13/2015 4:22:28 AM PST by risen_feenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: risen_feenix
The article points out that, if you have a speed-of-light weapon that can instantly be pointed in any direction, you can yield on top speed and maneuverability.

Laser weapons still have to shoot through a glass lens and have to point at the enemy. You cannot magically have the beam emerge from any point on the aircraft skin.

The Airborne Laser test bed turret was pretty ugly...


34 posted on 12/13/2015 7:14:00 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson