[Will88]

Hewitt showing his ass again, throwing a question at Trump on an obscure subject. A search of Free Republic's archives brings up one thread on the subject in all the years of FR's existence, an article from National Defense Magazine, not exactly a magazine in every office and home.

Could the Nuclear Triad Become a �Bi-ad?�

I'd heard of the nuclear triad at some point over the years, but didn't immediately recall what it meant. It hardly ranks up there with "Mutually Assured Destruction" and "First Strike Capability" which are terms that have been frequently heard for decades.

For Hewitt to throw out a question asking a candidate to discuss the merits of bombers, ICBMs and submarines as delivery mechanisms for nuclear warheads was just plain stupid in a presidential debate. Hewitt showing his ass and trying try make Trump look bad.

Maybe next debate some showoff moderator will ask for a discussion of the merits of various fighter aircraft and minesweepers in the US arsenal.

[mad_as_he$$]

Oddly I was instantly sure that was posted by sukhoi-30mki.