Posted on 12/19/2015 9:33:43 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[NOTE: I'm not posting the results here but if you check the site, you won't believe the results. At first I thought Hillary did just so-so and then I realized I was just looking at the numbers and not the names.]
(Excerpt) Read more at polldaddy.com ...
Drudge has not updated the page where it shows 60 per cent for Sanders 30 per cent for O’Malley and 7 Per cent hillary clinton. 40 thousands votes.
The poll was open 10 minutes into the debate and nothing has changed on Drudge since then. The debate is over and still only 40,000 votes.
Not scientific but the Democratic base wants a hard-core socialist as their nominee.
Hillary is far too moderate for them and despite her plaintive plea, no one loves her.
Simply amazing!
**DRUDGE POLL**
SANDERS 60.15% (24,935 votes)
O’MALLEY 32.4% (13,432 votes)
CLINTON 7.45% (3,091 votes)
http://www.washingtontimes.com/polls/2015/dec/19/who-won-3rd-democratic-debate/
No one watched it.
People are not enthused over Hillary.
That she lost a debate stacked in her favor and given her status as the MSM-annointed Democratic front-runner is telling.
People want any one want Hillary to represent them on the Democratic side.
Believe the poll has been hacked by the hillary camp.
“the D party brass really need to get a reputable candidate lined up ...and quickly....”
Be careful what you wish for!
I fear Caroline Kennedy. Clinton would be the better opponent for the repubs.
She needs to win the nomination first.
She has everything going for her but one thing: likability.
No one likes her. And it need not be added no one trusts her.
I agree. That is why she is better for the repubs than some dark-horse newcomer.
Even the fake Indian would have been more popular than Hillary.
Hillary is an average, mediocre politician.
She lacks her husband’s charisma and good ol’ boy image.
I voted for Bubba. Would I vote for Hillary? She doesn’t have the goods.
And she’s not a political star.
The Dem choices for President go from bad to worse and worst.
Yup.... and Hillary is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Dems can’t field a deep bench.
You forgot to mention HRC was late coming back after the break, so they started without her. Also, she appeared to be under the influence of a mood altering chemical after her extended break.
I’m sure my Vote for Bernie skewed the Results. LOL
We always knew there was no difference between a democRAT and a socialist. Even the totalitarianism of islam does not deter the democRATs.
Wee
Hillary’s attitude was, “why do I need to be here?” The peasants are gonna coronate me anyway.
For Hillary, a debate is unneeded background noise.
They should require a Breathalyzer Test to attend the Democrat Debates.
Not for the Audience, for the Debate Participants.
**DRUDGE POLL** WHO WON THE 3RD DEM DEBATE ‘16?
CLINTON 8% 3,276 votes
O’MALLEY 32% 14,002 votes
SANDERS 60% 26,055 votes
43,333 Total Votes
Mine included for Bernie!
I wouldn’t be surprised if Hillary was tanked.
She looked annoyed at having to be there in the first place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.