Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fresh Wind; patq
George W. Bush won Iowa in 2000 by 10 points with the backing of evangelical Christian voters over second place finisher Steve Forbes (another businessman). Bush lost NH by a large margin of 18 points (McCain won big in NH in 2000). George W. Bush went on to become the GOP nominee in 2000 and was the eventual winner in the general election.

2016 could be a repeat of the outcome in 2000, especially since there is greater importance early in the primaries on southern states on March 1 (SEC primaries) where Cruz has great organization and is expected to do well.

96 posted on 12/20/2015 10:10:13 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Unmarked Package

A big difference. Bush was still the favorite in most states, Cruz is the big underdog everywhere else. The bandwagon effect isn’t going to work for Cruz even with the liberal media’s help.


98 posted on 12/20/2015 10:13:35 AM PST by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Unmarked Package

Correct. George W Bush won by crushing it in South Carolina and then rolling with the ‘mo.

The CRUZ path to victory is similar. Cruz wins Iowa, he places in NH (in 2nd place now and will strengthen if he wins Iowa) ... but then wins in SC and uses that momentum to win in SEC states and go the distance.


181 posted on 12/21/2015 8:56:49 PM PST by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson