If you discount the first two years of Clinton’s presidency when the Democrats controlled both Houses of Congress, and the last two years when Clinton was just a useless parody and a buffoon in the White House, you could make a strong case that he actually governed as a more conservative chief executive than George W. Bush.
I would say you are correct about Clinton. Reagonomics was working good by then and he did nothing to hinder it, and as a result there were very prosperous times.
I would say Bush II did more to harm the country than Nixon.