I guess Bill does not rate like Billy Cosby
Pretty sure that is NOT a complete list.
Ands some of the “consensual” encounters, IIRC, weren’t all that consensual.
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON,
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK
‘DO YOU REMEMBER?’
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000
As I watched Rick Lazio’s interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio’s views regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too.
I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed.
I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton’s bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering.
Do you remember? You told the driver, “Bill has talked so much about Juanita”, and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you
kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the
last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.
What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.
Yes, I can answer Brit Hume’s question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the
thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I
only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.
I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.
Juanita Broaddrick
Arkansas
It’s the Washington Post ... significantly less truthful, timely and accurate than the National Enquirer.
Why, The Washington Post has become the handicapping news sheet on the libido of Bill Clinton.
Looking at their results, I bet $20 that Bill Clinton has sex with that mule robot.
Glenn Kessler has his kneepads on!
Seems the WashPost’s overriding theme here is,
“look, here we go again with these kooky Republican smears on the great Bill Clinton, we don’t think it’s a serious matter so we’re not going to go into details .... but when it comes to Sarah Palin’s e-mails, we can muster up thousands of investigative journalists to minutely examine every single one!!!”
(blah, blah, blah)
What about his links to ‘Orgy Island’?
“Some might argue that because Lewinsky and Gracen had relations when Clinton was in a position of executive authority, Clinton engaged in sexual harassment.”
Just call me “Some”, then. A middle-manager at a burger joint would have been charged with sexual harassment, if he’d even suggested an employee do what B.J. had Lewinsky do to him. Clinton was the “most powerful man in the world” and Lewinsky a lowly intern — there could be no bigger “power differential” between the two. When the NOW defended B.J.’s actions, I lost all respect for the “feminist movement” (but, not for the ideal of equality of the sexes). “Argue” indeed — it was sexual harassment; there is no counter-argument.
CLINTON IS FOUND TO BE IN CONTEMPT ON JONES LAWSUIT
Published: April 13, 1999
In a scathing 32-page ruling, Judge Susan Webber Wright said Mr. Clinton testified falsely in a Jan. 17, 1998, deposition that he had not had sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky. Judge Wright, of Federal District Court in Little Rock, Ark., said the President’s actions had subverted the rule of law and violated Ms. Jones’s right to information relevant to her case.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/13/us/clinton-is-found-to-be-in-contempt-on-jones-lawsuit.html
Here is a better list:
Riiiiight. And if you claim that the sun rises in the east you'll need to consult a panel of UN scientists to be sure of it.
First of all you have to ask yourself the question “Why is the Washington Post helping us here”? Bill Clinton’s affairs, rapes & sexual harassments aren’t the issue. Hillary’s defense, obfuscation, denigration etc. are the issue. Those are the issues that need to be brought to light. Don’t let the MSM determine the dialogue.
The following is from the newspaper owned by Ivanka Trump's husband:
It's very clear; the media is covering up everything they possibly can. A lot is in the linked article and the legal eagle lawyer I didn't want to name the other day is named in the article.
In the linked article, read about the flight log. Usually it was Clinton's usual name but once it was different, maybe more.
As I said the other day, in all my reading, I don't recall anyone actually accusing Clinton of a specific liaison on the Virgin Islands. May be afraid to. That's what a lot of it is about so we will never know the true number of women preyed upon.
And someone wrote that Lewinsky was the predator. Fair enough. Some wondered if the MOSSAD put her there. In any case, if she had overtly fondled him and whatever else she is accused of, that still is no excuse for Clinton taking advantage of it in light of the rules in place now about sexual harassment in the workplace. A real man would not have taken the bait and furthermore in a high position should know that he could be entrapped and ruin his career.
The Washington Post is attempting to cover this over and make it 'nothing to see here - move on'...
I know this much - IF there were credible rape charges against Trump - and he had used goons to shut the women up - the effing Washington Post would NOT cover it this way.
Womanizing?
So, according to either Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post or his headline writer, sexual assault is simply "womanizing"?
Womanizing: engaging in numerous casual sexual affairs with women
Right - allegations of forcible rape are no different from having casual sexual affairs?
At least the article separates "consensual" from "unwanted" sexual encounters, but lumping both under the heading of "womanizing" certainly seems to trivialize the alleged assaults.
There they go again. The Clintonistas/Obamanistas down at the retarded WaPo defending the commie ‘RATS again. That crap would get “old” pretty quick to a normal person.