[The All Knowing All Seeing Oz]

The ACU did not give him an 88% approval rating because he was wrong on too many issues!

Please remember President Reagan’s caution that someone who disagrees with him 20% of the time was not a 20% enemy; they were his 80% friend.

In this case, it’s 88%.

The bigger problem however is the recently history of nominating supposedly conservative candidates who were so inept as politicians that they lost the General we should have won easily. Maryland, Nevada, etc.

Nominating this new doctor would again replace a friend with a candidate unknown to voters, and probably lose us the General.

Let’s be glad we have the 88%

[fifedom]

The bigger problem however is the recently history of nominating supposedly conservative candidates who were so inept as politicians that they lost the General we should have won easily. Maryland, Nevada, etc.

---

GOP establishment candidates have also lost some big ones. In North Carolina. Elizabeth Dole lost an easily winnable race to an unknown state senator, Kay Hagan. In Wisconsin, the establishment hero and former governor Tommy Thompson lost to a far-left homosexual, Tammy Baldwin. In Minnesota, former governor and sitting RINO senator Norm Coleman lost to a washed up ex-comedian, Al Franken.

The ACU rating is easy to fool. The votes that really matter are the procedural ones like stopping or supporting filibusters. The ACU does not take those into account.

Even in your blurb, you state that Burr gets huge funding from Big Pharma. The man is a total sellout and represents everything that is wrong with the GOP.