[Lagmeister]

It initially needed 2/3 vote in the Senate, which means it would never have passed. Everything else you post is mere eyewash, total eyewash. Initially it had no chance to pass legally. The Corker bill gave Obama a pass, get it. Otherwise, he would have had a toothless agreement with the UN or an illegal action.

And you include the "good parts" aside of Trump. Gimme a break.

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “The Corker bill gave Obama a pass, get it.” <<

No Mr $hit faced liar, it did not.

The requirements of the Corker amendment have not been met, thus the “deal” is null and void, and acting under it is a felonious act.

[brothers4thID]

Obama would have signed it WITHOUT CONGRESS. What part of that is so hard for you to understand? Did you WANT it to be signed without Congressional approval?

Do you really think that this Congress would manage to impeach, much less convict, Obama, for signing an illegal treaty?

So again, do you think the Iran deal was a good idea? Mark Levin hates the Corker bill, but even he acknowledges that it made the best of an untenable situation.

If you are holding Cruz’s feet to the fire over Corker, how can you be ok with Trump, who said he would “keep the good parts”? There are NO good parts to that travesty.