Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Ted Cruz listens to Iowa farmers, supports Renewable Fuel Standard (Ethanol) through 2022
AmericasRenewableFuture ^

Posted on 01/06/2016 11:23:15 AM PST by springwater13

SIOUX CENTER - During a bus tour stop in Sioux Center, Iowa last night, Senator Ted Cruz expressed support for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) through 2022.

Responding to a question from an ethanol investor from Iowa about whether he would allow the landmark energy program to continue through its current expiration in 2022, Sen. Cruz responded by expressing support for the RFS through 2022.

Senator Cruz also expressed passionate support for breaking through the so-called "blendwall." That "blendwall" makes it illegal for ethanol to expand its market penetration, and I intend to eliminate the EPA blendwall to get rid of that barrier, which will enable ethanol to expand in the marketplace to a much larger penetration to sell more ethanol…."

The comments were substantially repeated at another stop in Cherokee, Iowa the same evening. You can listen to audio of the remarks here. and below.

(Excerpt) Read more at americasrenewablefuture.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; biofuels; bribery; canadian; corruption; crude; cruz; election2016; energy; ethanol; graft; ia2016; ineligible; iowa; liberalattackgroup; methane; oil; oilprices; opec; petroleum; politician4sale; rfs; rfsra; shortsighted; steveking; tedcruz; texas; theocracy; trumptroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-292 next last
To: Wissa

Those remarks were probably In Before The Flop!


81 posted on 01/06/2016 12:01:57 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
They have to be weaned off it.

Are you serious? There is no weaning off. If you end the mandate today or let it end in 2022 makes no difference. There is no weaning, it just ends. The only weaning would be after the end of the mandate.
82 posted on 01/06/2016 12:02:03 PM PST by PJBankard (It is better to be thought an idiot than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: springwater13
This is a major flip-flop from Cruz.

No, this was the EXACT same position he took in the spring of 2015. He said then, a FIVE-YEAR phase out. He would take office in 2017. 2017 + 5 = 2022.

I don't like ethanol in my gasoline either, but with all the infrastructure in place for this garbage, we can't turn off the spigot overnight without ruining a lot of jobs and businesses that were playing by the rules in place.

Five years will be enough time to repurpose or phase out the refineries that were created for corn-to-fuel, etc.
83 posted on 01/06/2016 12:02:03 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Maybe you need to ask ARF state director Branstad why the NEW stance, for Ted....

ARF state director Eric Branstad said:

Farmers and rural communities across Iowa are going to be encouraged by Sen. Cruz’s remarks. He is clearly listening to the people of Iowa and understands the importance of the Renewable Fuel Standard to America’s economy and energy independence, as he started the caucus process calling for immediate repeal. While not perfect, this is a big step forward by Sen. Cruz.

I guess Mr Branstad....the director of America's Renewable Future, is pushing incorrect information.

I guess all of the news agencies are 'getting it wrong', too...

Cruz changes position, embraces current ethanol mandate, ethanol lobby applauds

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cruz-changes-position-embraces-current-ethanol-mandate-ethanol-lobby-applauds/article/2579743

Not to mention, he's been running on his outright rejection of the subsidies, for some time now...

Senator Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) attended the Iowa Ag Summit over the weekend and stood alone among attendees in his outright rejection of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), the ethanol subsidies that have a significant impact on Iowa’s agricultural economy.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/03/09/cruz-applauded-for-rejecting-ethanol-subsidies-at-iowa-ag-summit/

84 posted on 01/06/2016 12:02:05 PM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Ethanol is damaging my car every single day I drive it. And I’ve already had one $300 repair due to ethanol.. so truthfully I don’t give a rats ass about the people who been making money off of destroying my car. And that does not include the increased fuel consumption due to ethanol.


85 posted on 01/06/2016 12:02:15 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
...as he started the caucus process calling for immediate repeal.

Close, but no cigar. Ted introduced legislation calling for the repeal of the RFS, but it called for a 5-year phase out. Even back in March of 2015, the following was written:

On Friday, March 12, the USA Today editorial argued in favor of ending the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandate. It also recognized Sen. Ted Cruz as the only participant willing to state his opposition to the mandate before an audience of farmers at the Iowa Ag Summit last week. Sen. Cruz has introduced legislation calling for a 5-year phase out and ultimate repeal of the law.

You really need to stop misrepresenting his positions, or do a better job of research.

86 posted on 01/06/2016 12:02:39 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

That gif is creepy.


87 posted on 01/06/2016 12:03:06 PM PST by PJBankard (It is better to be thought an idiot than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Ted, kicking the can down the road.


88 posted on 01/06/2016 12:04:28 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Trump and Cruz are not attacking each other. Why don't their follows take note)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; All

Funny that a lifetime of proven flip flopping did nothing to prevent all these ‘conservatives’ bitching up a storm from going to the polls and voting for a guy that profits from BBQing the dead and dismembered babies his own laws helped create.

But Ted Cruz is a bridge too far.


89 posted on 01/06/2016 12:04:47 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
His site does not say after 2022.

The legislation Cruz submitted over a year ago specifies a 5-year phase-out. If Cruz takes office in 2017, then 5 years would take it to 2022... Doh!

90 posted on 01/06/2016 12:04:58 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: springwater13

This report is substantially different from earlier positions.


91 posted on 01/06/2016 12:05:00 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
Cruz knows that as President he doesn't have the authority to unilaterally do away with a law that Congress has passed and a President has signed. Cruz knows that the law extends to 22. He is saying he will let it expire and would veto any new law.

BTTT

92 posted on 01/06/2016 12:06:27 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

I remember it. All was complaining. Now if Cruz is all the sudden saying the same. I see this as yet another example of Copy Cat Cruz, whatever works for Trump can work for him. Problem is, Trump said it first and got grief as he did and about the WALL. Now Cruz wants one too. The only thing Cruz hasn’t said yet, he’ll get Mexico to pay for it. Trump said this. ;)
GO TRUMP GO... All others just wannabe YOU!! ;)


93 posted on 01/06/2016 12:07:15 PM PST by djstex (Trump Towers Above them ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: okie01; thackney

This seems consistent with both what Cruz has said in the past about the fuel standard and also with (what little I know of) the oil/gasoline market.

I would appreciate thackney’ input in this regard though, just as confirmation of what you said okie01.

Is it true? Have the corn subsidies already stopped and/or would ending the fuel mandate all of a sudden plunge the oil/gasoline market into chaos?

Thanks in advance,


94 posted on 01/06/2016 12:07:35 PM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
You really need to stop misrepresenting his positions, or do a better job of research.

FYI....I posted a quote, from the article at OP link, from the Director of the ARF. Here it is, again, for you....

In response to Sen. Cruz's statements, ARF state director Eric Branstad said:

Farmers and rural communities across Iowa are going to be encouraged by Sen. Cruz's remarks. He is clearly listening to the people of Iowa and understands the importance of the Renewable Fuel Standard to America's economy and energy independence, as he started the caucus process calling for immediate repeal. While not perfect, this is a big step forward by Sen. Cruz.

You can apologize for your rude comment.

95 posted on 01/06/2016 12:08:07 PM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

How long to “wean” the corn farmers off this handout?? Years?
We are talking about using food for fuel here. End the absurdity and use oil, coal and nuclear. Now.


96 posted on 01/06/2016 12:08:21 PM PST by ErasmusJr. (erasmusJr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
Ted, kicking the can down the road.

Nope.

Senator Cruz honoring his word!

This has been his position all along, letting the current laws sunset. Which they will in 2022.
97 posted on 01/06/2016 12:08:27 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dforest
He claimed he was against them.

And he is, and has always been against them.

What he did not say before or now, is that he would be King and not president and he could magically change existing laws.

98 posted on 01/06/2016 12:08:31 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

How long to “wean” the corn farmers off this handout?? Years?
We are talking about using food for fuel here. End the absurdity and use oil, coal and nuclear. Now.


99 posted on 01/06/2016 12:08:34 PM PST by ErasmusJr. (erasmusJr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: okie01
There are no longer any ethanol subsidies. Those ended last year and they were not renewed.

I was thinking they were still in place.

Thanks

...ethanol can't compete with 30-40, even 50 dollar oil.

So how will the RFS through 2022 be achieved?

100 posted on 01/06/2016 12:08:45 PM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson