Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scalia: Natural Born Requires Jus Soli ("of the soil")
Chicago_Kent College of Law ^ | 1/9/2001 | Supreme Court Transcript

Posted on 01/06/2016 3:58:46 PM PST by sunrise_sunset

Tuan Anh Nguyen vs IRS (No 99-2071)

Transcript at the Oral Argument pop-up

Justice Scalia: I mean, isn't it clear that the natural born requirement in the Constitution was intended explicitly to exclude some Englishmen who had come here and spent some time here and then went back and raised their families in England ?

They did not want that.

Davis: Yes, by the same token...

Scalia: That is jus soli, isn't it ?

Davis: By the same token, one could say that the provision would apply now to ensure that Congress can't apply suspect classifications to keep certain individuals from aspiring to those offices.

Scalia: Well, maybe.

I'm just referring the the meaning of natural born within the Constitution.

I don't think you're disagreeing.

It requires jus soli, doesn't it ?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: constitution; cruz; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; scalia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
The meaning of "natural born" is not so clear. It probably does not mean a citizen at birth, but rather, a person who would not be under a birthright claim by another country.

To think this is settled law is obtuse.

There are other interview quotes attributed to Scalia in which he indicates "natural born" means born in the U.S.

1 posted on 01/06/2016 3:58:46 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset
but rather, a person who would not be under a birthright claim by another country.

Many countries will give a person citizenship if their grandparents were born in that country. They can't be president?

2 posted on 01/06/2016 4:01:09 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset
The meaning of "natural born" is not so clear. It probably does not mean a citizen at birth, but rather, a person who would not be under a birthright claim by another country.

A country can claim as their citizens by jus sanguinis or jus soli or both. We get dual citizens because one country claims through parentage and the other by being born in country. These people in the United States could have obligations of loyalty to both countries making for conflicting interests. The Supreme Court before Scalia came on the scene have decided so and as it is logical.

3 posted on 01/06/2016 4:08:05 PM PST by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

Someone whose parent was born in Scotland can be recognized as a British citizen by descent.


4 posted on 01/06/2016 4:08:38 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Many countries will give a person citizenship if their grandparents were born in that country. They can’t be president?
********************************************************************************
Of course they can if they were born to an American parent.

Trump’s mother was Scottish and was naturalized several years before Donald’s birth. Did Great Britain ever remove her British citizenship? Probably not so she had dual nationality once naturalized — American and British. Does that effect Donald’s eligibility for the presidency? Hell no it doesn’t, not in the least.


5 posted on 01/06/2016 4:08:42 PM PST by House Atreides (Cruzin' and Trumpin' or losin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Italy has a two generation citizenship.


6 posted on 01/06/2016 4:10:47 PM PST by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

A country can claim as their citizens by jus sanguinis or jus soli or both. We get dual citizens because one country claims through parentage and the other by being born in country. These people in the United States could have obligations of loyalty to both countries making for conflicting interests. The Supreme Court before Scalia came on the scene have decided so and as it is logical.
*******************************************************************************
Red, a little advice...you need to rethink that because you are describing Donald Trump’s exact situation.

Trump IS eligible for the presidency...with NO DOUBT.


7 posted on 01/06/2016 4:11:41 PM PST by House Atreides (Cruzin' and Trumpin' or losin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

I think birthers are morons and need to get over it.


8 posted on 01/06/2016 4:11:55 PM PST by Timber Rattler ("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: ro_dreaming

Don’t all and any Jewish person have a birth right to Israeli citizenship?


10 posted on 01/06/2016 4:14:23 PM PST by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

There is a difference between a birthright claim and “giving someone citizenship”.


11 posted on 01/06/2016 4:14:43 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

When Trump’s mother married his father she took her husband’s US citizenship. Was like that back in the day. And furthermore, when a female US citizens became the wives of foreigners they lost their US citizenships upon marriage.


12 posted on 01/06/2016 4:15:35 PM PST by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Apparently Scalia is a moron too.

Jus Soli
1. (Law) the principle that a person’s nationality at birth is determined by the territory within which he was born.


13 posted on 01/06/2016 4:15:43 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

Did the Founding Fathers sacrifice blood, family, and fortune in a bitter Revolutionary War, only to acquiesce in the language of the Constitution and provide the children of British aristocracy an opportunity to usurp the office of President through American motherhood? Absolutely not; that would have been unheard of. To even suggest such a thing in early America would have raised thoughts of tarring and feathering as a "loyalist". I like Cruz and I hope he does *not* employ the leftist strategy of "move along, nothing to see here" to address this issue. It does nothing to encourage support. I wish he would tackle it head-on and indicate Obama's rise to POTUS settled this issue as far as he is concerned; that if Obama's lineage was approved, then his is amply sufficient. That strategy I would respect.


14 posted on 01/06/2016 4:16:50 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The Supreme Court has decided nothing about this.

Even Scalia isn’t sure.

It’s funny to see conservatives throw Scalia overboard in favor of Cruz.

Go to the link and find the transcript.


15 posted on 01/06/2016 4:17:32 PM PST by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

Scalia was making a comment in oral arguments. That is NOT anything like a decision.

For a discussion of the law, see here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/74189147/November-14-2011-CRS-Report-Qualifications-for-President-and-the-Natural-Born-Citizenship-Eligibility-Requirement

It covers all sides and gives extensive citations.


16 posted on 01/06/2016 4:19:01 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunrise_sunset

I didn’t say Scalia decided about this.

What I’m describing is a supreme court opinion that is detrimental to Cruz and would likely be brought up in court if it gets that far.


17 posted on 01/06/2016 4:19:18 PM PST by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

A child born to US citizens in a foreign country or US territory is a natural born citizen. Jus soli is as though the child was born on US soil.

That’s a matter of settled law. A child is NOT a natural born US citizen if he was born to foreign parents abroad. He would be a US natural born citizen if born here regardless of the parent’s citizenship status.

There are some exception like diplomats, whose children born here receive the citizenship of their country, not the US.

Some countries may extend citizenship to any one born on their soil along with whatever citizenship was claimed by their parents at the time of their birth.


18 posted on 01/06/2016 4:19:21 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Many countries will give a person citizenship if their grandparents were born in that country. They can't be president?

Born and raised in the US...served honorably in the Armed Forces...worked hard...paid my taxes....never got a nickel in welfare.But my mother was born in Ireland which,under Irish law,means that I was an Irish citizen when born.

19 posted on 01/06/2016 4:19:25 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Obama is and he never renounced his Brit and Indonesian citizenships, so the law has been broken . But He’s a DEM; double standard and all that.


20 posted on 01/06/2016 4:21:55 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson