Attention whore...
So much passion. So much blindness.
Like someone I just dealt with, you seem unstable my friend. Go Trump Go!
Name-calling. The whole damn article is name-calling. ALL of those words in the service of name-calling. Seems to me this ass could have just cut to the chase and saved himself a lot of work. How self deceiving must a person be to try to dress up a mere tactic into an actual argument
“How can you support this man?”
My most basic reason is that Trump is about as far from being Jeremy as a man could be. Liberalism and political correctness have all but buried what it means to be a man.
Men like Jeremy could never have fought the wars that he’s so fond of talking about and they most certainly could never have won them. Men like Jeremy(I do hope that I’m not committing one of those gender faux pas) could never have founded this great nation of ours nor could they have ever defended it against all enemies for centuries.
Jeremy is a product of a neutering campaign that’s been working pretty well to produce a kind of gender neutral sperm donor whose only purpose is biological. Trump reminds me of days gone by before Pajama Boys became fashionable.
Attention whore...
He is neither racist, sexist, nor mysogynistic.
He does not inflame people to acts of violence against anyone. I challenge you to show where he has done so, in spite of the fact that his daily rallies numbering in the tens of thousands, are neat, orderly, free of anger or profanity, and crime free-- before, during, and after. They lead to nothing except more and bigger peaceful rallies.
He advocates nothing but that the rule of law be applied to all people in this country: the minorities as it is applied (strictly) to the majority, non-elite, conservatives.
Face it, he's going to be the next President, and he will do a great job enforcing the law fairly. That may make you mad, because you are a bad American, but it will make millions of good Americans very happy.
Have a nice day!
I will bookmark this one to compare the talking points from a lefty yo the words of the “true conservatives” on this site.
Barack Obama has made that impossible. The only thing that will bring us together is a Third Great Awakening, and that is spiritual, not political. In the meantime, the left has decided that we are the enemy and need to be silenced, so we have to assume that they have no desire to come together with us, and design our politics accordingly.
(FD: I support Cruz for President.)
So according to the boy who wears skidmarked underwear that wrote the article Trump is a nazi?
Since when does securing our border and putting in place a temporary halt to bringing in unvetted Muslims equate to throwing Jews into ovens and gas chambers?
Wow what a stretch.
Trump might not be the most graceful wordsmith that ever walked the planet, but there’s more sense than this damning dolt wants to give even to a statement like “The beauty of me is that I am rich.” He’s talking about the position of independence it gives him (and possibly the credibility as a businessman). He gets a little swelled headed at times, but never so much that he can’t at least approximately see the truth.
It always cracks me up when someone declares someone else isn’t a good person.
Good people don’t declare themselves worthy of telling others who is a good person.
How do I know this author is a good person?
I don’t. So he can go fly a kite.
The Establishment is in control of both parties.
We will never get anything changed/removed and reset by anyone in the system. We have been screwed over enough times, to the point of ridiculousness. And even more insulting have so-called fellow conservatives rip us for criticizing the most open/brazen examples, saying to us where else are you going to go, we are all you’ve got. Can’t rip them because party loyalty and all that.
It’s why The Establishment, which controls both parties, is freaking out.
And I hope they keep freaking out and literally’sh1t themselves over this. I hope they stroke out. Every lastone of them.
Worse Opus ever! lol
I’m cool...
Thats as far as I got.
Trump may or may not be a good person. I think he has put himself in a postion to try to save our country. Nothing more than others have done and still do. And I’ve heard worse from presidents (mostly criminals in a suit) , lawmakers (criminals) and news readers (liars)..
My comments on the various statements in the article which has no annotations. My one documented annotation rebuts the lincoln crap.
How could someone make such statements and not quote any speech. I’d like to see the version where he documents the statements. So I will employ the negative of Fallacy of composition – assuming that something true of part of a whole must also be true of the whole.[34] where one point is false all is false. Ha ha
following are the excerpts from the peice and my comments with links to wiki fallacies which I would love to be able to recite from memory.
it’s not okay to marginalize an entire race of people, saying things like all the Mexicans are lazy, and they are all stealing our jobs and bringing drugs into our country. >> no quote from a speech which are all on youtube. Maybe Argument from repetition (argumentum ad infinitum) – signifies that it has been discussed extensively until nobody cares to discuss it anymore;[17][18] sometimes confused with proof by assertion Proof by assertion – a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction; sometimes confused with argument from repetition a.k.a. argumentum ad infinitum
Kicking all Muslims out of the country is not the answer, nor is it the acceptable behavior of a person in an extremely powerful position, like the President of the United States. >>> (shifting the) Burden of proof (see – onus probandi) – I need not prove my claim, you must prove it is false misquoted, muslim is a government ideology clothed in a religion that want to take over the world a death cult.
against the same ideas that Trump is pushing. The idea that certain religions are more dangerous than others and the idea that people should be judged based on the color of their skin rather than the content of their character. >>>> Argumentum ad lapidem (Latin: “to the stone”) is a logical fallacy Muslim is not a religion. It is a governmental system. He never judges anyon by their color. Only the death cult they believe. Nice red herring changing the “some religions are more dangerous than skin color†wow Red herring – a speaker attempts to distract an audience by deviating from the topic at hand by introducing a separate argument the speaker believes is easier to speak to.[50]
And then there are just the plainly insane people who finally snap and go on shooting rampages for no discernible reason at all. They just went mad. >>>> Begging the question (petitio principii) – providing what is essentially the conclusion of the argument as a premise.[22][23][24][25] public policy is not dictated by what a few insane people do.
“light the mother@!$%#er on fire” while a protester is being dragged out of one of his rallies. >>> no quote from a rally on this. I’ve listened to a lot mostly to not heard second hand what he says.
Grandma to get into a fist fight in her home. >>> Grandma got run over by a reindeer this year
If you’re not a racist, bigoted, misogynistic jerk then voting for Trump simply because you don’t like Democrats is wrong. If you are one of his supporters and you’re just a racist and you don’t care who knows it then vote for him, >> fallacy of false choice.
“[I am] calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on” - Donald Trump That’s religious discrimination. >>>> it’s saying let’s get a handle on what’s going on. Rational human beings do this everyday.
“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and cause me to tremble for safety of my country; corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in High Places will follow, and the Money Power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the People, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic destroyed.” >>>> no letter no speech no public record. At the time of lincoln corporations were specific government entities chartered for specific purposes like highly capitalized events. Railroads, canals, etc. Generalized incorporation laws were foisted on us by FDR in 1933. debunked on npr.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125169095
“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists… And some, I assume, are good people.” -Donald Trump Racist. >>>> Trump the truth teller. Nothing wrong with this at all
Here is a last fallcy
Shotgun argumentation – the arguer offers such a large number of arguments for a position that the opponent can’t possibly respond to all of them. (See “Argument by verbosity” and “Gish Gallop”, above.)
That is a leftist's opinion regarding ALL conservative people. So, it would be safe to say, "Donald fits it with the rest of us".
Blah, blah, blah. . .
“Ask yourself, are you a racist, sexist, hateful and ignorant person as well?”
Nix writes that like It’s A Bad Thing...
To the author: no one is perfect. Why didn’t you write the long Facebook post of vitriol over Barack Obama? He was unabashedly Black and Muslim uber alles while he was campaigning and has stayed so even while Presidenting. He is racist as well, always doing back bends to defend Muslims and/or blacks.
Re sexism: Donald Trump makes comments about beautiful women, and some off color remarks about himself, not in context of his campaign, but over his lifetime. Please. Did you write a similar soliloquy about Bull Clinton? You can’t get more womanizing and worse than Bill Clinton. And Hillary trashed Bill’s rape victims. She called them all nuts and sluts. She treated rape victims with abject cruelty.
If everything you say about Donald Trump is true, which it isn’t, why don’t you feel the need to address your friends who supported Democrat candidates with huge moral failings? Hm? Why do they always get free passes to be rude, crude, racist, and criminal?