Yeah like those white gunmen who stood with Washington during the Revolutionary War.
And the Panthers who marched through Dallas streets armed this past summer?
Eric Holder in the armed takeover of the ROTC building? Ayres and Dohrn in bombings and the killing of a cop? Angela Davis’ guns used in killing a judge?
There are no words. The media can’t call BlackLivesMatter terrorist even though their instructions lead to dead bodies. Muslim terrorism? What’s that?
Do the locals believe that the BLM should be their ilo Oregon? ilo their county government?
Do the locals believe that the BLM should be there ilo Oregon? ilo their county government?
Its sad to read this left-wing trashing but I am even more saddened by those who call themselves ‘conservative’ who want to express sympathy for the beleaguered land owners of the West, but take no real or meaningful action.
They then move on to condemn this protest people because it doesn’t serve their interests of sucking people in to believe the Republicans will do something when the GOP track record is doing nothing but talk and propose legislation that’s symbolic and or going nowhere near being law.
I don’t support the fake patriot Bundy’s but they haven’t used any force yet, which is what the definition of terrorism the article cites required.
If the facility had been occupied when they took it over it would be a different story.
If they are terrorists, so to is former Attorney General Eric Holder (armed takeover of Columbia Univ buildings), George Soros (funding BLM violence), and the beloved of the left street people in Berkeley (People’s Park) . . . The list would go on and on.
Whether one is a terrorist depends on their ideological distance from the Dem/Rep uniparty government.