Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

The Supreme Court ruled in 1874 in Minor v Happersett that: “The Constitution does not say, in words, who shall be Natural Born Citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to determine that.”
The courts deal with each legal challenge to Natural Born Citizen status on a case by case basis.


23 posted on 01/09/2016 12:19:02 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

Lets get to the nub of it without the law passed by Congress would Cruz be a citizen?


24 posted on 01/09/2016 12:21:31 PM PST by Red Steel (Ted Cruz: 'I'm a Big Fan of Donald Trump')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus

Omg.. The “resort” is obvious. Determine what the phrase meant AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION. Can Congress just decide to interpret the Constitution any way that it wants? Uh... NO.


86 posted on 01/09/2016 4:54:18 PM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson