Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
I doubt that, but there were foreign jurisdictions that were not “beyond Seas,” and that error was also corrected via the 1795 Act.

Oh don't be stupid. The phrase "or out of the limits of the United States" was in both acts. This would also include areas "beyond the seas", so "beyond the seas was redundant. Citizen at birth and Natural Born citizen are also redundant.

39 posted on 01/09/2016 1:11:43 PM PST by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Starstruck
Citizen at birth and Natural Born citizen are also redundant.

This is not true. Natural Born Citizens existed after July 4, 1776 without any resort to statute law. It is obvious that their existence is not dependent upon statute law.

Therefore, someone who's citizenship *is* dependent upon (subsequent to 1776) statue law, cannot be the Natural Born citizens which the founders spoke of in 1787.

43 posted on 01/09/2016 1:22:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson