Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

I would go with the definition as it was understood at the time the Constitution was ratified. Subsequently changing the meaning of a term should not change the intent of the original document.


5 posted on 01/09/2016 11:18:32 AM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Dalberg-Acton
Look at the difference between the two. The 1795 law (which would take precedence, replacing the earlier one) makes it clear that the child of US citizen parents born outside the US is a citizen but not a natural born citizen.
14 posted on 01/09/2016 11:59:56 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dalberg-Acton

Exactly! CONGRESS CANNOT CHANGE THE MEANING OF A SINGLE WORD IN THE CONSTITUTION. So no act of Congress means anything with regard to NBC.


15 posted on 01/09/2016 12:04:58 PM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson