To: Mollypitcher1
Here's
Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Like most immigrants, he does a job Americans won't:
defending the Constitution.Yes, Ted Cruz Can be President
August 26, 2013., by Ilya Shapiro
As we head into a potential government shutdown over the funding of Obamacare, the iconoclastic junior senator from Texas - - love him or hate him - - continues to stride across the national stage.
With his presidential aspirations as big as everything in his home state, by now many know what has never been a secret:Ted Cruz was born in Canada.
(Full disclosure: I'm Canadian myself, with a green card.
Also, Cruz has been a friend since his days representing Texas before the Supreme Court.)
But does that mean that Cruz's presidential ambitions are gummed up with maple syrup
or stuck in snowdrifts altogether different from those plaguing the Iowa caucuses?
Are the birthers now hoist on their own petards,having been unable to find any proof that President Obama was born outside the United States
but forcing their comrade-in-boots to disqualify himself by releasing his Alberta birth certificate?
No, actually, and it's not even that complicated; you just have to look up the right law.
It boils down to whether Cruz is a "natural born citizen" of the United States,the only class of people constitutionally eligible for the presidency.(The Founding Fathers didn't want their newly independent nation to be taken over by foreigners on the sly.)
What's a "natural born citizen" ?
The Constitution doesn't say,
but the Framers' understanding, combined with statutes enacted by the First Congress, indicate thatthe phrase means both birth abroad to American parents - - in a manner regulated by federal law - -
and birth within the nation's territory regardless of parental citizenship.
The Supreme Court has confirmed that definition on multiple occasions in various contexts.
There's no ideological debate here:Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe and former solicitor general Ted Olson - -who were on opposite sides in Bush v. Gore among other cases
- - co-authored a memorandum in March 2008 detailing the above legal explanation in the context of John McCain's eligibility.Recall that McCain --lately one of Cruz's chief antagonists
- - was born to U.S. citizen parents serving on a military base in the Panama Canal Zone.
In other words, anyone who is a citizen at birth - -as opposed to someone who becomes a citizen later ("naturalizes"
or who isn't a citizen at all
- - can be president.
So the one remaining question iswhether Ted Cruz was a citizen at birth.
That's an easy one.
The Nationality Act of 1940 outlines which children become "nationals and citizens of the United States at birth."
In addition to those who are born in the United States or born outside the country to parents who were both citizens - -or, interestingly, found in the United States without parents and no proof of birth elsewhere - -
citizenship goes to babies born to one American parent who has spent a certain number of years here.
That single-parent requirement has been amended several times, but under the law in effect between 1952 and 1986 - - Cruz was born in 1970 - -someone must have a citizen parent who resided in the United States for at least 10 years,
including five after the age of 14, in order to be considered a natural-born citizen.
Cruz's mother, Eleanor Darragh, was born in Delaware, lived most of her life in the United States, and gave birth to little Rafael Edward Cruz in her 30s. Q.E.D.
So why all the brouhaha about where Obama was born, given that there's no dispute that his mother, Ann Dunham, was a citizen?Because his mother was 18 when she gave birth to the future president in 1961
and so couldn't have met the 5-year-post-age-14 residency requirement.
Had Obama been born a year later, it wouldn't have mattered whether that birth took place inHawaii,
Kenya,
Indonesia,
or anywhere else.(For those born since 1986, by the way,the single citizen parent must have only resided here for five years,at least two of which must be after the age of 14.)
In short, it may be politically advantageous for Ted Cruz to renounce his Canadian citizenship before making a run at the White House,
but his eligibility for that office shouldn't be in doubt.
As Tribe and Olson said about McCain - -and could've said aboutObama,
or the Mexico-born George Romney,
or the Arizona-territory-born Barry Goldwater
- - Cruz "is certainly NOT the hypothetical 'foreigner'who John Jay and George Washington were concerned might usurp the role of Commander in Chief."
The Naturalization Act of 1790, let's read it !
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled,That any Alien being a free white person,who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years,
may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the Stateswherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least,
and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court thathe is a person of good character,
and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by lawto support the Constitution of the United States,
which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer,
and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon;
and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States.
And the children of such person so naturalized,dwelling within the United States,
being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization,
shall also be considered as citizens of the United States.
And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States,shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, thatthe right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States:
Provided also, thatno person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid,except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.
11 posted on
01/09/2016 9:10:23 PM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
It’s a pity you and Ilya Shapiro lack reading comprehension. You’re posting the proof that Obama, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, Santorum, and many others are not natural born citizens as required by the Constitution.
14 posted on
01/09/2016 9:30:12 PM PST by
WhiskeyX
To: Yosemitest
Naturalization has nothing to do with Natural Born citizen.
15 posted on
01/09/2016 9:30:32 PM PST by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: Yosemitest
Shapiro might have some big letters behind his name, however, he is not an educated constitutional scholar, he is nothing but a political hack of a DC lobbying firm that seeks to keep up that ‘hope & change’ that Obama promised ... the hope and change of re-writing the constitution to fit their political agendas.
âSubject to the Jurisdictionâ: You Canât Have It Both Ways UPDATED with 2 Official Proclamations From The US Administration of 1859”
“Why Liberals & So-Called Conservatives on Both Sides of the Aisle Despise the 14th Amendment”
excerpt from the 1859 Administration release that was published nationwide: âThe question then arises, what rights do our laws confer upon a foreigner by granting him citizenship? I answer, all the rights, privileges and immunities which belong to a native-born citizen, in their full extent with the single qualification that under the constitution, âno person except a natural born citizen is eligible to the office of Presidentâ¦â
âHere none but a native can be Presidentâ¦A native and a naturalized American may therefore go forth with equal security over every sea and through every land under Heavenâ¦They are both of them American citizens, and their exclusive allegiance is due to the Government of the United States. One of them never did owe fealty elsewhere, and the other, at the time of his naturalizationâ¦threw off, renounced and abjured forever all allegiance to every foreign prince, potentate, State and sovereignty whatever, and especially to that sovereign whose subject he had previously been.â
This 1859 OFFICIAL release from the US Govt was still being quoted by Harvard Law School when Ted Cruz was born!!! So unless there has been some ‘hope & change’ since then in the form of a constitutional amendment, Crus IS NOT constitutionally qualified to be president or vice president.
Natural Birthright Citizenship: Birthright of Blood According to English Common Law
https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/?s=1859&submit=Search
And then there is “A Congressional Natural Born Citizen Parts I, II & III: Who Knew What and for How Long”
https://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/a-congressional-natural-born-citizen-parts-i-ii-iii/
33 posted on
01/09/2016 10:25:23 PM PST by
patlin
("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
To: Yosemitest
And FYI, you better go back and reread that 1790 Naturalization Act because you missed the fact that in 1790 and until after WWII, the wives and children of marriages held the citizenship of the husband/father. I guess you missed that part where is says that children of fathers who failed to naturalize could at the age of 21, apply for US citizenship. Of course today, the age is lowered to 18.
36 posted on
01/09/2016 10:31:54 PM PST by
patlin
("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
To: Yosemitest
Wow that is a lot of legal gibberish, and lots of hoops to jump through to prove Cruz can legally be President even though his father wasn’t and he was born in Canada.
Too bad in a nation of over THREE HUNDRED MILLION PEOPLE, we can’t find ONE person who WAS BORN HERE with TWO PARENTS who were born HERE!
Because that would definitely be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, and you wouldn’t have to pull out case law and lawyers to prove it..........oh wait......there are others running for President of the United States of Canada...ah I mean AMERICA....WHO WHERE BORN IN AMERICA TO PARENTS WHO WHERE BORN IN AMERICA.....I wonder who they are?
I bet one of them is Donald Trump.
K.I.S.S. is something we say in the military. No reason it can’t apply to who is a natural born citizen.
478 posted on
01/13/2016 12:30:58 PM PST by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson