Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
One more reason I wouldn’t pi$$ on The Turtle if he was on fire.
I refused to vote for him this last time around. Not that my vote counted for much.
3 posted on
01/12/2016 11:52:16 AM PST by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
To: SeekAndFind
Trump and the RINOs working together to stop the real and best conservative candidate.
5 posted on
01/12/2016 11:53:45 AM PST by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
To: SeekAndFind
Cruz isn’t ‘fumbling away’ anything. His detractors are doing their level best to take him out on a technicality.
6 posted on
01/12/2016 11:54:17 AM PST by
skeeter
To: SeekAndFind
Prince Rebus thinks he can work with Trump better than Cruz.
Rebus thinks Trump is the lesser challenge to the GOPe.
Probably a miscalculation on his part.
7 posted on
01/12/2016 11:54:25 AM PST by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: SeekAndFind
Thank God we elected all those lesser evils to protect us from conservatives.
8 posted on
01/12/2016 11:56:13 AM PST by
Norm Lenhart
(Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
To: SeekAndFind
McConnell, better be careful what we sows now or a Cruz presidency in the future will steamroll him.
9 posted on
01/12/2016 11:57:04 AM PST by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: SeekAndFind
I could live with a Trump/Cruz winning ticket.
Cruz, VP & President of the Senate!!
..becoming McConnell's boss.
10 posted on
01/12/2016 11:57:55 AM PST by
TexasCajun
(#BlackViolenceMatters)
To: SeekAndFind
Anything for Rubio...
I don’t think the GOP will give up until after the convention.
Which is good: we don’t have to worry about them coming to a compromise, favorable to RINOs, with Cruz or Trump.
After the convention the GOP will have little choice and little to offer.
12 posted on
01/12/2016 11:58:26 AM PST by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: SeekAndFind
13 posted on
01/12/2016 11:59:34 AM PST by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: SeekAndFind
McConnell: No, Senate wonât pass resolution affirming Cruzâs eligibility like it did for McCain It really shouldn't matter since whatever Mitch "0bama's Bitch" and his RINO cronies say doesn't amount to a hill of beans and doesn't change the facts. The SCOTUS is the one to interpret The Constitution.
15 posted on
01/12/2016 12:01:49 PM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(My Forefathers Would Be Shooting By Now!)
To: SeekAndFind
“The Senate previously issued a resolution [in 2008] confirming then-nominee John McCain’s eligibility to serve as president. The Arizona senator was born on a military base in Panama to American parents.”
Which carried absolutely zero legal authority.
19 posted on
01/12/2016 12:04:32 PM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: SeekAndFind
23 posted on
01/12/2016 12:08:07 PM PST by
South40
(Ted Cruz = the only conservative in the race)
To: SeekAndFind
Thanks Mitch! I’m sure the Cruz campaign appreciates the unintended endorsement.
To: SeekAndFind
Corruptocrat McConnell
Cruz Eligibility
Fraud McCain
Senate Resolution? NO <— Entirely Pedictable
Fact: Cruz is Eligible
Action: Primary McWeasel
27 posted on
01/12/2016 12:10:28 PM PST by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: SeekAndFind
McConnell’s about as useful as a poop stain.
32 posted on
01/12/2016 12:13:17 PM PST by
Bullish
(Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
To: SeekAndFind; Norm Lenhart; cripplecreek; TADSLOS; EQAndyBuzz; cloudmountain; erod; Isara; ...
Wow, The Uniparty unites against Cruz.
What a Shock.
33 posted on
01/12/2016 12:13:29 PM PST by
KC_Lion
(The fences are going up all over Europe. We shall not see them down again in our lifetime.)
To: SeekAndFind
No sweat. The GOP has certified that Cruz is qualified.
35 posted on
01/12/2016 12:14:25 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: SeekAndFind
Precedent Obama has rendered that clause moot.
Under the current definition of simply being born a citizen, if even only on one’s mother’s side, makes every anchor baby and Winston Churchill eligible. (his mother was an American)
I went to school in the 1960’s and was taught that natural born citizen was a subset of citizen and required only for the office of President. Must be born here to citizen parents. Reading the writings of the people who wrote the Constitution confirms this. They wanted no divided allegiance. If you could be anything other than a U.S. citizen, you can’t be a natural born citizen. No foreign births, no foreign parents.
Many people wanted the definition changed for various reasons.
One of the reasons was to make McCain eligible, which benefitted the current usurper.
39 posted on
01/12/2016 12:15:58 PM PST by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: SeekAndFind
Stuck in the middle! I see "living Constitution" proponents on one side claiming any and all citizens at birth are natural born. And I see "uniparty progressives" on the other side doing everything they can to hurt someone nearly as much a strict Constitutionalist as I am. I want Cruz to assume office with a promise as President he will press the Supreme Court for review of original intent regarding natural born citizenship. Let Chester Arthur be the first ineligible POTUS, Barack Obama be the middle ineligible POTUS, and Ted Cruz be the last ineligible POTUS. The schadenfreude would be delicious.
40 posted on
01/12/2016 12:16:21 PM PST by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson