Aw... shucks...
Posted on 01/16/2016 4:42:23 PM PST by HarleyLady27
I like one thing.....
A lot.....
You sound as crazy as Beck. I admitted I liked Beck for a while, as many people here did, but when he went crazy I dropped him. The hypocrites would be the “I never liked him and always knew he was crazy†types who were his biggest fans a few years ago. Maybe that's you? I can't see what else would have you squawking like a parrot.
Is there some reason you can't quote what you are replying to? Without reference your comment looks like a crazy random attack from a young skull full of mush.
All I remember saying to you is that no-one had a time machine in 2009 and 2010 to figure out that Glenn Beck would go cuckoo and flush down the toilet all the praise and goodwill he earned at that early stage.
During the first year of DingleBarry, everyone was clinging to whatever voice of reason that they could find. Beck was hitting them out of the park for a while, a TV show that actually featured the Constitution, several great ones on the unsung black heroes of our early republic, others concentrating on the Supreme Court and Constitutional issues. And of course the wholehearted support of the TEA Party phenomenon. You couldn't ask for more in that time period. He was actually on track to pass O'Reilly in the nightlies when Fox made its move to fix their problem.
So along comes you, 5 years later saying I told you so!. Is that your big point? Well good for you. You are a sage. Next time you reply to me have the courtesy to quote what the heck you are on about, mmmkay?
Oh please... And you forgot the aliens.
Elsie, your wonderful priesthood, has governed many folks back to true catholic non-reality.
The numbers are staggering. Thank You!
Dang!
How COULD I!?!?!
May the Kolobians forgive me!!!
I feel certain this is an electioneering law violation, but the Establishment would have to pursue and of course they're not going to cause problems for the Political Class/Washington Cartel/Insider candidate.
I wish Trump would sue Beck's a$$ and finally take him out of our misery. Political dirty tricks need to be punished if they involve political operatives directly involved with a candidate.
I won't even bother posting the link, because nothing will be done by law enforcement/DOJ/state election commissions/state Secretaries of State (who oversee state elections) to harm the Washington Elite/Insider candidate who, if he wins, could cause them a world of trouble.
Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses
(b) Fraudulent misrepresentation. 2 U.S.C. § 441h Section 441h prohibits fraudulently representing one's authority to speak for a federal candidate or political party. As a result of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the provision contains two specific prohibitions:
Section 441h(a) forbids a federal candidate or an agent of a federal candidate from misrepresenting his or her authority to speak, write, or otherwise act for any other federal candidate or political party in a matter which is damaging to that other candidate or political party. For example, Section 441h(a) would prohibit an agent of federal candidate A from issuing a statement that was purportedly written by federal candidate B and which concerned a matter which was damaging to candidate B.
Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses
(b) Fraudulent misrepresentation. 2 U.S.C. § 441h Section 441h prohibits fraudulently representing one's authority to speak for a federal candidate or political party. As a result of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the provision contains two specific prohibitions:
Section 441h(a) forbids a federal candidate or an agent of a federal candidate from misrepresenting his or her authority to speak, write, or otherwise act for any other federal candidate or political party in a matter which is damaging to that other candidate or political party. For example, Section 441h(a) would prohibit an agent of federal candidate A from issuing a statement that was purportedly written by federal candidate B and which concerned a matter which was damaging to candidate B.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.