Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: House Atreides
For Cruz, the rule is simple. Was he born the citizen of one of the states? If that comes back "negative", he's naturalized.

Even simpler, if his citizenship depends on a statute, he's naturalized. His citizenship depends on a statute, he's naturalized. See Rogers v. Bellei.

I don't want to get into Rubio and anchor baby stuff.

I pulled up the statue re Guam to show you by counterexample, that your contention was false, or at least had consequences that you won't like. Here is what you said, and I ask, do you still hold this to be true?

The ONLY damn thing "natural born citizen" means is that the person is an American citizen immediately upon their birth.
Is the point of this 10 iteration back and forth an attempt to prove or disprove that? We don't have to prove Cruz is not an NBC, all we have to prove is that he is naturalized, citizenship depends on statute, he's not qualified.

I think you are making this issue of much bigger scope, and I am not going to have the time or patience to do that.

365 posted on 01/17/2016 8:43:24 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Well, it was fun while it lasted...but you “tired” of a METHODICAL, step by step process of examination, saw your squirrel and off you went...without answering all my questions.

OK, it’s been real. Enjoy your preconceived notions and your squirrels.


401 posted on 01/17/2016 9:42:44 PM PST by House Atreides (Cruzin' [BUT NO LONGER Trumping'] or losin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson