What are you talking about? Wha ...?
I am among a number of people who are turning down Palin's endorsement of Trump.
You are among a group who are gobbling it up.
It would be the same (but reversed) if Palin had instead endorsed Cruz. You ask: "Would Cruz have turned down here endorsement?" Huh?
Palin endorsed a guy who has left a trail like a chocolate-dipped caterpillar of a political left-leaning and influence-buying past going back more than 25 years.
In that SAME 25 years, Ted Cruz has left a trail of a guy who has studied the Constitution and used his knowledge, including as Texas senator, to advance conservatism and halt leftism. He has a live, standing demonstrated record.
Trump has a record of being a middling real estate negotiator who has overstated his influence and savvy in media marketed imagery, switching parties at least three times in that duration, being an enthusiastic supporter of the Clintons, etc. etc. Do we really need to go into it? No.
We will all lose even if Trump wins because he's a big government leftist showman. Palin picked the loser. That's all there is to say.
You didn’t answer the question.
So I will answer it for you.
Yes, Cruz would have welcomed her Presidential endorsement
as he did her Senate endorsement.
Sour grapes. That is all it is.