Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

So... you agree with me, but don’t like me. I don’t care.


143 posted on 01/22/2016 4:50:52 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine; Ha Ha Thats Very Logical; Cboldt

Women never had the right to pass on natural born status prior to the 14th Amendment [father’s citizenship always essential], and no new rights were added by it. Why did you fail to notice the point?

Quoting Greetings Puny Humans:

[quote]

... the 14th amendment did not add any privileges, it merely provided additional guarantee of protection for such rights they already had. From the court Syllabus:

“The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had.”

[unquote]

I realise that even an originalist is not a strict constructionist. It would be fine to point out the difference. Maybe that would clear it up.

— FRegards ....


146 posted on 01/23/2016 4:08:23 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Cruz and Trump FRiends strongest when we don't insult each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson