Why would an immigration (positive) law be needed by someone who was supposed to already be a citizen through natural law?
Because that is where the definitions of natural, naturalized were changed/upgraded, who qualifies, who doesn’t, etc. I think(I may be off a few years) the last changes were in the early 60’s and those were the ones that covered Obama’s citizenship concerning his mother’s residency and age requirements. It is all a convoluted mess, typical of how D.C. gets their hands on something and muddys it up.
The earliest changes were after the Civil War when blacks were given citizenship. Then some in the late 1800’s then some about 1920 or so. Not too sure as to the exact dates.
Never the less, if anybody HAS STANDING it will get settled for good.