Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Promises 'Great Management' -- No, We Need Limited Government
National Review ^ | 01/23/2016 | Yuval Levin

Posted on 01/23/2016 7:26:46 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 last
To: Randall_S

You are correct sir! In war there is no substitute for victory.


141 posted on 01/23/2016 1:56:34 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is there a way to block National Review from my browser? We block porn don’t we?


142 posted on 01/23/2016 2:17:30 PM PST by R Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01
How do you get limited government without great management?

You stop trying to manage so dang much! We don't need great management, we need NON-management. Let the people, freely, manage themselves. For those few things that only a government is capable of managing use the level of government closest to the people capable of doing the job. Local over state, state over federal. The Framers gave us a Republic, vehemently NOT a pure democracy.

Alas, of the current crop of 'republicans' only Cruz talks and acts like he underseands what being a Republic means. His college dissertation was on the 9th and 10th! Hillary's was on Alinsky and that has oft been cited as revealing her true self. Cruz has the opposite indicator. Cruz says gay marriage isn't near the top of his to do list, because it's not a federal matter. If the federal courts hadn't unconstitutionally pre-empted the matter and he was running for Governor he'd rank it differently because he'd have jurisdiction. And he's willing to take the hit from that hack Huckabee and defend his position. Cruz says the feds shouldn't be picked winners or losers between different types of energy. I bet he'd allow Iowa to provide Iowa tax breaks or subsidies to ethanol, at Iowa's expense, should Iowa so wish. Meanwhile Trump want to force the entire country to pay for Iowa's deal. This Iowan wishes Cruz's position applied at both the federal and my state's level!

143 posted on 01/23/2016 2:17:53 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Changed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: R Rogers

RE: Is there a way to block National Review from my browser?

Don’t go to their site or don’t click on any article that says National Review.


144 posted on 01/23/2016 3:08:09 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rafael Eduardo Cruz’s CFR connections:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh256.htm


145 posted on 01/24/2016 8:18:14 AM PST by Lonely Are The Brave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Are The Brave

The connections you mentioned to CFR are via his wife’s joining the task force.

In the last part of the Task Force’s report, “Additional and Dissenting Views,” Heidi S. Cruz wrote (pp. 33-34):

“I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector.

There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us—truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.”

What’s wrong with the above?


146 posted on 01/24/2016 9:52:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Lonely Are The Brave

RE: From the same link you gave....

Ted Cruz indicated he “remains open to a path to legal status for undocumented workers.”

How’s that different from Trump’s statement last June?

http://www.tmz.com/2015/06/27/donald-trump-deportation-welfare-illegal-mexico-presidential-candidate/

Donald Trump says if he’s elected president, he’d let undocumented workers who are productive stay in the United States, but if they just sponge off the system and don’t contribute ... he’d have them deported.

Trump tells TMZ, he’d create a “system of merit,” saying people here illegally should have “a road to legal status” if they work hard and contribute to the country.


147 posted on 01/24/2016 9:56:41 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson