Trump said he wanted to use the EPA to enforce higher EFS - is that Conservatism, Yes or No? This has nothing to do with Nixon.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump suggested Sunday that he would eliminate several federal agencies if he were elected president.
Asked on “Fox News Sunday” how he would cut spending, Trump named the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency as potential targets.
“No, I’m not cutting services, but I’m cutting spending. But I may cut Department of Education. I believe Common Core is a very bad thing. I believe that we should be — you know, educating our children from Iowa, from New Hampshire, from South Carolina, from California, from New York. I think that it should be local education,” Trump said.
“So the Department of Education is one,” he continued. “Environmental Protection, what they do is a disgrace. Every week they come out with new regulations.”
Asked by host Chris Wallace who would protect the environment in the absence of the EPA, Trump maintained that “we’ll be fine with the environment.”
“We can leave a little bit, but you can’t destroy businesses,” he added.
This is the first I am hearing and with your hatred toward Trump makes you perhaps not as fair to him as I would be.
Trump said he wanted to use the EPA to enforce higher EFS - is that Conservatism, Yes or No? This has nothing to do with Nixon.
Interesting you have a problem with what Trump “says” but never a problem with what Cruz DID. Like take $100,000 in campaign cashola from Goldman Sachs and then advance their agenda in the U. S. Senate by campaigning for TPA/TPP. Goldman Sachs was the largest donor to the U. S. Senate during the TPA debate and wrote much of the 5,000 page TPP that Cruz enabled.
There’s a difference between hot air and the damaging actions of a sitting U. S. Senator. I’m sad to see you apparently can’t discern the difference.