Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twink
The point that you missed (which I find disturbing for a fellow Freeper) is that the media should not be on anyone's side. That's the idea of an independent media. Kelly asked Trump a fair question about his use of personal attacks in women he disagrees with, which often involve nasty comments about their looks or sexual innuendo. Trump's later reaction was to make personal attacks on Kelly, which included innuendo of a sexual nature. Point proven. He also tried to imply she was taken off the air by Fox (supposedly proving Trump was right), but it turned out she was on a family vacation that had been planned for months. More lies from Trump. You clearly missed the point of my comment that Trump trying to control the media is as bad, if not worse, what Obama is doing. Try re-reading it and see if that helps. Many of Trump's supporters are as guilty of being blind to his obvious lack of qualification as the Obamaistas were in 2008. History repeats.
88 posted on 01/23/2016 7:23:09 PM PST by Apparatchik (If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Apparatchik

Nope. I didn’t miss a thing. I know exactly what you’re saying and implying.


129 posted on 01/24/2016 4:58:59 PM PST by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson