Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dalberg-Acton
I think the contracts with the sponsors were contingent on Trump being in the debate.

Since these debates are not mandatory, I'm betting there will be no debate.

Like we need another debate anyways.

Trump is doing the right thing.

110 posted on 01/26/2016 4:26:51 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

419 posted on 01/26/2016 4:56:01 PM PST by kiryandil ("When Muslims in the White House are outlawed, only Barack Obama will be an outlaw")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
Agreed. It takes a lot of guts to do this. For many years, we've been complaining here about how unfair the debates were to the Republicans. Always liberal media talking heads.

Would the Democrats ever submit to a debate that featured people like Rush Limbaugh and Mark Steyn as moderators? Of course not. Instead, Democrats get to stack the panel with their favorite sycophants and their softball questions. Last night's Democratic "debate" was a farce. Basically the candidates came out one at a time to take pre-scripted questions from the audience.

No doubt FoxNews were readying the sharp knives for Trump for Thursday night. I'm sure Trump would have survived it but why even bother? Trump does not need this debate. I'm sure that whatever else he decides to do Thursday night, it will draw a larger audience.

603 posted on 01/26/2016 5:15:52 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson