I subscribed to Commentary during the run up to Iraq, when the term “Neocon” was in full use. I recall no such predilection for lawbreaking.
Medved is Establishment Boehner, IMO, less Neocon pro interventionist. Medved is clearly pro-law-breaking.
Praeger was clearly a lead Neocon. I haven’t listened to him in a long time. When I did listen, I never heard pro-law-breaking.
So, even with these two, I see difference.
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-case-for-more-immigration/
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-realities-of-immigration/