Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Refuses to Play by the Rules
Rush .com ^ | January27,2016 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/27/2016 4:06:47 PM PST by Hojczyk

Now, it's very simple, if you read The Art of the Deal or if you know Donald Trump at all, it's very simple: He had an unpleasant experience in the first debate, and in his mind, the question that he was asked was rigged. Don't forget, before that first debate, remember all of the news stories that were floating around saying that that debate, somebody at Fox had been given orders by the Republican establishment to take Trump out. Remember that? There were any number of so-called sources for this. Some said it was the donors demanding it. Some said that it was Fox News executives demanding it. Some said it was the RNC demanding it.

Well, Trump's not immune. He hears it. And even if he hadn't heard it he would have to know that they want to take him out; he's outside the game; he's breaking all the rules. He's exposing so much as fraud that has gone on inside the American political process for so long they can't allow somebody like this to win and succeed. It's quite natural they would want to take him out as well. It's Bengals-Steelers time here, folks. It's quite natural they'd want to take him out. Well, he heard it.

Here comes Megyn Kelly's first question. He didn't hear anybody else get a question like that. He never sees Hillary Clinton get a question like that. He never hears Bill Clinton or another Democrat get a question like that. So he answers it and says screw this. I'm not putting myself in that position again. Why should I? I don't have to.

But the rules of the game say when there's a debate, you show up. Screw the rules, he's saying. Why should I willingly give them another shot at me

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2016 4:06:47 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Good article. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/01/27/trump_refuses_to_play_by_the_rules

He’s not avoiding the people of Iowa. He’s all over Iowa. The guy does more TV and radio than any other candidate out there. So I don’t think there’s fear, and I don’t think it’s disrespect for the people of Iowa. This is what it looks like when some guy stands up to the rules and the game and says, “Screw yours; I’m looking out for me first. That’s all this is. And you can say whatever you want, but I am not dumb. I’m not gonna give you the gun and the bullet and stand still. You want to hit me, come get me, but I’m not gonna put myself in your line of fire.” That’s what he’s doing, if you ask me.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: We’ve just scratched the surface on this. There’s a lot to add to this because there’s new elements now to add to it. But I routinely am asked in the e-mail by people in the audience, “Why don’t you do more TV? You’re never on TV.” And there’s an answer for that: “I don’t want to.” The reason is, why would I go someplace where I know that exactly whatever they tell me they want to talk to me about, it’s not gonna be that? Why would I go someplace that I know doesn’t support me, doesn’t like me, disagrees with me, would love to embarrass me or damage my show?

Why should I do that? I have no desire. But the rules say, “Camera, TV! You gotta go on.” No. I don’t want it, I don’t like it, and I certainly don’t want to reward the people who have been spreading misquotes and lies for years. Why should I help them? That’s me personally. That’s why I don’t do a whole lot of TV. Folks, you wouldn’t believe the number of times a week that we turn down invitations here. I don’t mention it because there’s never been a reason to, but it’s appropriate now to tell you since I get questions about it anyway.

It’s all about not rewarding people who I know do not have my best interests at heart, who I know have no interest in anything other than notching their belt. Why help ‘em? Especially when I don’t like doing makeup anyway. So for me, it’s a no-brainer. And it’s also easy. I don’t have to go on TV to be seen or heard, so I’m fortunate in that regard. A lot of people, the only way they can be seen or heard is to go on TV. And they end up loving it and so forth. It’s never captivated me.


2 posted on 01/27/2016 4:09:33 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Republican voters have complained for years that their candidates don’t stand up to the media.

Trump tells FOX to take a hike, and everybody loses their minds.

Don’t know why Rush didn’t mention this today.


3 posted on 01/27/2016 4:16:16 PM PST by Arm_Bears (I'll have what the gentleman on the floor is drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Trump not playing by the rules. Heck thats one thing he has in commom with Obama. Just saying


4 posted on 01/27/2016 4:20:53 PM PST by Breto (Stranger in a strange land... where did America go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

And Ted begging for a debate shows his weak position. He’s lost the last 6 and is desperate. People who beg for debates with the leader historically lose the race.
I used to think Ted for VP. Now it’s more AG or SCOTUS.


5 posted on 01/27/2016 4:21:59 PM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Breto

“Trump not playing by the rules. Heck thats one thing he has in commom with Obama. Just saying”

fight fire with fire. playing by the rules while your opponent doesn’t is a loser’s game. and we’re all familiar with how THAT’S gone for GOP Presidential candidates for the last eight years. time to try something different.


6 posted on 01/27/2016 4:25:27 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Also — Ted begging for a debate would be breaking an RNC rule. Hey Ted! Have some respect for how the system works! If you don’t respect the real rules, how do you expect to work with others and get things done???


7 posted on 01/27/2016 4:25:43 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Breto
I don't think you read the post.

"Well, Trump's not immune. He hears it. And even if he hadn't heard it he would have to know that they want to take him out; he's outside the game; he's breaking all the rules. He's exposing so much as fraud that has gone on inside the American political process for so long they can't allow somebody like this to win and succeed. It's quite natural they would want to take him out as well." - RUSH

Trump is breaking the rules of the insider political process game; Trump is an outsider, Rush says. Trump is exposing the fraud of the INSIDERS like Cruz, Washington Political Class, etc.

8 posted on 01/27/2016 4:26:53 PM PST by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

“And Ted begging for a debate shows his weak position.”

that is actually true.

Cruz is simply copying what Jeb Bush tried a month ago:

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/264328-bush-challenges-trump-to-one-on-one-debate

it’s what losers do. they try to shine in the reelected light of the winners when their own light dims. on the other hand, the shinning winner can only be diminished by sharing his light with a loser, which is of course why winners shun sharing their light with losers.


9 posted on 01/27/2016 4:27:23 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Obvious conclusion that fails to be recognized. No wonder this country is in such disarray.


10 posted on 01/27/2016 4:27:53 PM PST by mazz44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Well, in the job he is running for, you won't always get the questions you think are 'fair'. S**t happens, and you can't walk away from the 3 AM phone call...oh wait, that's what we have a serious problem with now.

If Mr tough guy who is going to kick the Congress into line can't handle a tough debate, then what would do when the dems get slow pitches down the middle and he gets nothing but knuckleballs and sliders?

11 posted on 01/27/2016 4:28:13 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

argggg!

“reelected” = “reflected”

mutters about stupid spell checker ...


12 posted on 01/27/2016 4:29:06 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Bro, you're the only person I've SEEN who nailed it like I wrote a day or two ago:

Thank you. Great minds must think alike.

After every debate during presidential cycles, Republicans and conservatives come on FR and say, rightfully, "WHY does the Republican leadership allow our candidates to participate in these debates moderated by liberals and haters whose questions are totally designed in prejudice and bias to GET the Republican? Why do we do it every year? The Republicans need to refuse to do it with these mainstream media/Government controlled media asking the questions with their extreme leftist/Democrat party bias." EVERY debate season preceding every presidential election. Why doesn't the GOP chairman stop this, why AGREE to it, why not DEMAND to be treated fairly? Why do we need "moderators" asking questions anyway?

NOW we finally have a candidate with the cajones, the only one in this bunch, only one in living memory, to refuse to participate unless the debate host network removes the HIGHLY PARTISAN, unqualified, proven Trump hater, transparently seeking to curry favor with her left wing friends and colleagues.

And NOW the Cruzers on FR who weren't even around for all these previous debates in history, or knew or cared nothing about politics then, or were simply Democrats---NOW these people, to support their Establishment candidate, call Trump a COWARD, he's too afraid to face Megyn Kelly. Even Ted Goldman Sachs Cruz is saying it. That's pitiful, because THIS is EXACTLY what conservatives and republicans have wanted for years and years: to NOT let the host network get away with using moderators who are leftists intent upon embarrassing and trying to ruin our candidates, in this case Trump.

So Trump is THE one to set the precedent, to DO what everyone before just TALKED about, and the idiots who should be over on Commitment2Establishment so childishly say, Trump is afraid of Megyn Kelly! LOL!!!!!!!!!!

PS---Trump kicked ass in SIX DEBATES and no one laid a glove on him, and now the losers want another shot at the heavy weight champion. But they aren't in his class. So no rematch.

13 posted on 01/27/2016 4:29:59 PM PST by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

>>Republican voters have complained for years that their candidates don’t stand up to the media.

>>Trump tells FOX to take a hike, and everybody loses their minds.

>>Don’t know why Rush didn’t mention this today.

He did.... in a later segment.

Rush:

“But see, this is my point in the first hour: The game, the rules, the way this has all evolved, the media does control who gets access. The media does control. You’ve heard it, you’ve called here and complained about it. The Republicans have to not only beat the Democrats, they have to beat the media, and you complained that to the Republicans and what do they tell? “Yeah, that’s just the way it is. Yeah, I know. But that’s our cross to bear.” Well, Trump is saying, screw it. I’m not playing that game.”


14 posted on 01/27/2016 4:31:38 PM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

That can be good and bad.


15 posted on 01/27/2016 4:32:03 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Blindgossip item that is clearly about FOX
http://blindgossip.com/?p=76263

Not surprising that ad buyers would pull out of pre and post shows


16 posted on 01/27/2016 4:34:00 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I think what he means is “Trump continues to redefine the rules”. Which is what conservatives have begged for for decades...


17 posted on 01/27/2016 4:36:39 PM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first ande then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Won’t be listening to Rush after today. His fawning over Me Gyn was sickening. And, his pimping for Cruz....


18 posted on 01/27/2016 4:37:34 PM PST by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Apples and oranges.

You have to get to that position first. If he gets there in this manner, he will be a greater intimidating force to get this ship turned around.


19 posted on 01/27/2016 4:38:36 PM PST by mazz44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
“..... the question that he was asked was rigged.”...

Can anyone argue with that statement? We all know damn well it was rigged and sprung on Trump, he didn't like it and is now retaliating. This whole thing was a setup from the get go to be rid of Trump and he is pissed. He is leading the entire pack and does not need to go into another rigged debate. I applaud him for standing his ground. I blame the whole thing on the GOP establishment, Fox News and Megan Kelley but their plan backfired.

20 posted on 01/27/2016 4:41:45 PM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson