Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer
"The dicta cited endlessly here from various cases does not have the authority of a precedent holding."

The United States Supreme Court in Minor did make a direct holding that Mrs. Minor was, in fact, a US citizen. The Court established her citizenship by definining the "class" of "natural-born citizens" as those born in the US to parents who were citizens. Then the Court included Virginia Minor in that class thereby deeming her to be a US citizen. And they did this by specifically avoiding the 14th Amendment and by specifically construing Article 2 Section 1.

MINOR V. HAPPERSETT IS BINDING PRECEDENT AS TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Neither the 14th Amendment nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen

52 posted on 01/29/2016 9:26:43 AM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: All

That debate will kill Cruz. Consensus is that he lost.

Trump is going to win Iowa now and Rubio might get second. If that happens, Cruz will do a slow burn and fade away.


54 posted on 01/29/2016 9:34:49 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Reagan conservative: All 3 Pillars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Godebert

Fail. One set of criteria was determined. Other possible classifications were not affirmatively excluded. The only criteria that interested the Minor court was what applied in that case. Adjudication of one born American on foreign soil was neither addressed nor excluded. Sorry.

Peace,

SR


65 posted on 01/29/2016 10:11:45 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson