Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Reform, AB13, Passes Wisconsin Legislature, goes to Governor Walker
Ammoland ^ | 31 January, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 02/01/2016 3:45:30 AM PST by marktwain

Wisconsin State CapitolWisconsin State Capitol

A gun law reform bill passed the Wisconsin legislature on 20 January of 2016, with little fanfare.  It was approved by both the Milwaukee Police Association and the National Rifle Association.  Overall, the bill makes reforms in the way that courts treat the return of firearms when they are taken into custody by police.

The bill creates a rigid legal framework for gun owners to regain possession of their property.    It does this by requiring courts to issue orders to police to return guns under rigidly defined conditions.  It is an incremental reform, as it provides a clear vehicle for a person to have a firearm returned; but there are significant flaws.

The most obvious flaw is the burden that is placed on the owner of the firearm.  The police took the private property.  The burden should be on them to return it if it becomes clear that no charges will be filed, or for other reasons that are stated in the legislation.  Instead, the burden will lie with the property owner.  Time and expense required to retrieve the firearms may well be more than modest firearms are worth.  Here is the analysis of the law by the legislative Reference Bureau.  I have added spacing to make the analysis easier to read. From AB13, Wisconsin Legislature:

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; wi
AB13 is an improvement over current law, but it places the burden of recovering an impounded or confiscated firearm on the firearm owner.

The burden should be on the police who took the firearm, to return it.

1 posted on 02/01/2016 3:45:30 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“The burden should be on the police who took the firearm, to return it.”...........

Guess the law makers see otherwise. The best way to get your gun back is to NOT lose it in the first place, obey the laws and “no problem”, at least thus far.


2 posted on 02/01/2016 3:52:20 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

If you ever have to use your gun in self-defense, the police WILL take it as evidence, and WILL keep it until ordered to return it by a court. If it’s a particularly nice gun, it may find its way into some cop’s personal collection.

Ideally, the law should state that, if no charges have been filed by a deadline of 90 days, the police need to return it, with failure to return being treated as theft, and the chief of police being liable.


3 posted on 02/01/2016 3:56:58 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

First, you assume the arrested is actually guilty.

2nd, it is personal property and part of an estate. Even if the arrested is guilty, his effects should rightly go to his heirs for their benefit.


4 posted on 02/01/2016 4:01:41 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

“The best way to get your gun back is to NOT lose it in the first place, obey the laws and “no problem”, at least thus far.”

Too bad everyone commits about three felonies a day, whether they wish to or not.

You are naive if you believe that prosecutors cannot come up with a crime to charge you with, if they desire to do so.

In addition, police routinely take guns without a crime being committed; often just because: Gun!

I have heard first person accounts of too many cases (most often in California) where police confiscated guns simply because the guns were present.

The police then refuse to give them back without a court order.

As obtaining a court order usually cost more than the value of the gun(s), it became legalized theft.


5 posted on 02/01/2016 4:05:18 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37
obey the laws and “no problem”, at least thus far.

"If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about comrade." Lavrenty Beria

Your faith in government is quaint.

6 posted on 02/01/2016 4:22:24 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It is incremental in the right direction. Remember, the left got us where we are incrementally. We must be patient.


7 posted on 02/01/2016 4:30:31 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Remember...after the primaries, we better still be on the same team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

It is incremental in the right direction. Remember, the left got us where we are incrementally. We must be patient.
*****************************************************************************
Yep, EVERY step in the right direction takes us away from the wrong direction. We must encourage CONTINUOUS additional right-direction steps.


8 posted on 02/01/2016 4:47:20 AM PST by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Someone comes to your store with a gun. You shoot them. They take your gun. They don’t charge you because you were completely within the law. But it costs you a lot of time and money to get your gun back. In fact, you need to buy another gun.


9 posted on 02/01/2016 4:55:37 AM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

OH, SHUT UP, YOU DAMNED CRUZ BACKER!!!

Didn’t you get the memo from the DC Uni-Party??? We are supposed to be in open warfare to split the conservative vote and insure their preferred candidate wins in November!

Get with the program. What the hell are you, a Patriotic American Citizen???

Sheech!


10 posted on 02/01/2016 5:05:29 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Remember...after the primaries, we better still be on the same team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

f you ever have to use your gun in self-defense, the police WILL take it as evidence, and WILL keep it until ordered to return it by a court.


That is why is is wise to have several guns.


11 posted on 02/01/2016 5:22:25 AM PST by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist
That is why is is wise to have several guns.

And not store them all in one place.

12 posted on 02/01/2016 5:36:12 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

How ‘bout once GOVT obeys the Constitution, We the People follow the Law?

More time that now, they are taken by police, regardless if charged or not, and willfully hold until court ordered.

IMO, they should be returned immediately (if not charged, or after trail/etc.). Failure to do so holds EACH in the line of evidence liable(as, more than likely, it never should have been taken to begin), let’s say 5x the value.


13 posted on 02/01/2016 5:38:10 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

We’re talking here of people whose guns were taken and there turned out to be no case against them and their guns should be returned. Are you assuming only criminals’ guns are ever confiscated by police?


14 posted on 02/01/2016 6:28:45 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy, Cruz that is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Doesn’t sound like any improvement to me. The owner still needs to deal with some menial pinhead to get his guns back.


15 posted on 02/01/2016 8:47:04 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

obey the laws and “no problem”

And cover your a$$


16 posted on 02/01/2016 8:59:30 AM PST by Rannug ("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Too bad everyone commits about three felonies a day, whether they wish to or not.

You are naive if you believe that prosecutors cannot come up with a crime to charge you with, if they desire to do so.

In addition, police routinely take guns without a crime being committed; often just because: Gun!

I have heard first person accounts of too many cases (most often in California) where police confiscated guns simply because the guns were present.

The police then refuse to give them back without a court order.

As obtaining a court order usually cost more than the value of the gun(s), it became legalized theft.

I too can speak of a 1st person account.


17 posted on 02/01/2016 9:02:40 AM PST by Rannug ("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; onyx; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; ...

Wisconsin legislature revises gun law with approval of law enforcement and NRA.

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.


18 posted on 02/01/2016 3:49:40 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson