Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Is A 'Natural Born Citizen,' Board (Illinois) Of Election Finds
Huffington Post ^ | 02/02/2016 06:37 pm ET | Cristian Farias

Posted on 02/02/2016 4:36:59 PM PST by 11th Commandment

On the same day he won the Republican Iowa caucus, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas got a favorable decision from the Illinois Board of Elections, which ruled that he met the citizenship criteria to appear on the state's primary ballot.

Two objectors, Lawrence Joyce and William Graham, had challenged Cruz's presidential bid with the board, contending that his name should not appear on the March 15 ballot because his candidacy did not comply with Article II of the Constitution.

In response to the filings, Cruz's lawyers relied on Supreme Court precedent, legal history and articles from noted constitutional scholars to defend the view that he is in fact "natural born" within the meaning in the Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: cruz; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-555 next last
To: outofsalt
The law I quoted in post 197 defines who is a citizen at birth and I linked to it.

Yet it is a law passed by Congress and Congress can only pass naturalization laws.
Anybody who establishes their citizenship based upon a law passed by Congress has been naturalized.

It's that simple, but, please, keep citing an Act of Congress as your vehicle of preference. It simply makes my job easier.

281 posted on 02/02/2016 7:22:56 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Cruz's memorandum of law cites the Katyal/Clement article, and relies on the contention that NBC is not defined. It avoids the cases that find citizens born abroad to be naturalized. It cites the 1790 act as a definition, and the "radical" (at the time) British naturalization acts that made British subject born abroad, into British subjects. It also states as a truism, "citizen at birth = NBC." It falsely says that "nowhere in the constitution does it say that a person must be born in the US" (Art IV, Sec. 2 is "citizen of a state," no help to Cruz; and the 14th amendment is "boring in the US," no help to Cruz, or "naturalized"). It also cites the Zivotofsky v. Kerry case where Thomas had a brain fart moment.

Although the consular report of birth abroad shares some features with a passport, it is historically associated with naturalization, not foreign affairs. In order to establish a "uniform Rule of Naturalization," Congress must be able to identify the categories of persons who are eligible for naturalization, along with the rules for that process. Congress thus has always regulated the "acquisition of citizenship by being born abroad of American parents . . . in the exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution to establish a uniform rule of naturalization." United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 688 (1898) ; see also Miller v. Albright, 523 U. S. 420, 456 (1998) (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment) (recognizing that "Congress has the power to set the requirements for acquisition of citizenship by persons not born within the territory of the United States"). It has determined that children born abroad to U. S. parents, subject to some exceptions, are natural-born citizens who do not need to go through the naturalization process. 8 U. S. C. S:S: 1401(c), (d), (g).

On their face, the bolded passages are conflicting on the question of a 1401(g) person being naturalized.

Cruz's memo also cites McCain precedent and S.Res. 511, old-man Romney, and a CRS publication.

Finally, it cites the applicable naturalization law as evidence that Cruz was not naturalized.

IL State board response - includes Cruz argument - 58Mb pdf file

282 posted on 02/02/2016 7:23:03 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Truth is the enemy of the status quo... the law is whatever anyone says it is, that is until one notes Cruz or Rubio not being eligible to hold the office of president. Then the pages get filled with all manner of exemptions for the unlawful.
283 posted on 02/02/2016 7:23:17 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

A natural born citizen of the United States cannot be anything else. Period. I was born in the United States, my parents were citizens of the United States. No matter how much I might think it cool to have dual citizenship or be a natural born citizen of somewhere else, I cannot, physically impossible because I was born here.

Anyone who can be a natural born citizen of another country or have dual citizenship with another country due to birth cannot be a natural born citizen. Period.


284 posted on 02/02/2016 7:23:26 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

He has been posting on this topic long before trump.


285 posted on 02/02/2016 7:23:40 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
I know that section of the Constitution, and nothing there says that the judiciary has exclusive responsibility to interpret the Constitution. It says they are able to decide cases in law that arise under the Constitution.

You are incorrectly conflating the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury vs. Madison with something from the Constitution itself. But both the Executive and the Legislative branches have the responsibility to interpret the Constitution, and to act as a check and balance against the other branches incorrectly interpreting the Constitution. For example, if the Congress and the President decided that Roe v. Wade was incorrect, they Congress could pass a statute that overturned it, and could remove the jurisdiction of the courts to rule on the statute.

286 posted on 02/02/2016 7:23:42 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2016

Consider:

Cruz is nominated. Clinton is nominated.

Cruz is found ineligible. Clinton is indicted.

Obama remains in office during the “emergency”.

The issue demands immediate resolution.


287 posted on 02/02/2016 7:24:01 PM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

oh dear!


288 posted on 02/02/2016 7:24:11 PM PST by RginTN (Donald J Trump- why would the people of Ky want a rookie senator when they have Sen Mitch Mcconnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Yes,
Natural born Citizen:

Born to U.S. citizen parents on U.S. soil.

Naturalized:

Anyone else

Most of the GORONS on this thread are being deliberately obtuse because you really want a Canadian or Cuban President after ‘our’ Kenyan one:

Pull your heads out of your puckered sphincters.


289 posted on 02/02/2016 7:25:32 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (DEPORT OBOLA VOTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Your analysis is lacking. But even taking your proposition as true, Cruz was naturalized according to the rule of law that is applied in thousands of born-abroad citizenship cases decided every year.


290 posted on 02/02/2016 7:26:30 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

Okay - another member in my “idiot box” and I trust you will put me, in yours.


291 posted on 02/02/2016 7:27:50 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

In case you do not know this character is a lawyer... He does not even know what natural born, under original intent is... and has a law license. Everything this character claims is suspect.


292 posted on 02/02/2016 7:28:47 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47
Ummmmm...I'm on the "Obama/Cruz/Rubio are not natural born citizens side. I don't see why you posted that to me.
293 posted on 02/02/2016 7:29:46 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti
Find me any legal document that states, "on US soil". I have cited (and linked) the law on the definition of birthright citizenship (natural).
If you can cite your definition in law I would be happy to reconsider.
294 posted on 02/02/2016 7:31:10 PM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Given her interpretation of the immigration statute...I am wondering if she really is a lawyer. P!us as someone pointed out...she used the wrong one


295 posted on 02/02/2016 7:33:30 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Okay - another member in my “idiot box” and I trust you will put me, in yours


why? I only consider liberals to be idiots. Conservative/Libertarians, are smarter than them even if we disagree.


296 posted on 02/02/2016 7:34:29 PM PST by RginTN (Donald J Trump- why would the people of Ky want a rookie senator when they have Sen Mitch Mcconnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I pinged an awesome attorney who also is a wonderful teacher...ask away

Excellent! I would look forward to some constitutional law opinion by an unbiased observer.

I support Trump, I have since the day he announced. I acknowledge that Trump used the birther issue to beat Cruz over the head with...hey its politics. It was the tool he had.

As for Cruz getting a decision with the Illinois Sec of State regarding his status. If no one challenges the Sec of State ruling, then perhaps it will hold.

Look like I said I support Trump, I also support Cruz. I wish Trump would grow a bit as a candidate and I don’t know if it is possible. Cruz is unelectable in the general. He just doesn’t have the charm or charisma. It is not all about ideology. There is a certain “something” that steers us to choosing a leader. Quite frankly, if Cruz asked me to follow him up the hill, I don’t know if I would. With Trump it is different. Two different types of men.
Ever go to a function and there is a guy/gal in the room that everyone wants to be around. Trump has that. Cruz does not. Reagan had that affable nature too. (I am not suggesting that Trump is Reagan.)

Rubio is a putz. He IS the GOPe candidate. read this: http://tinyurl.com/RubioDecieves Rubio is gaming us. He says one thing in English and another in Spanish. This is one example and I am sure there are others. All Trump has to do is run an ad with this. As for Cruz, all Trump needs to do is run and ad refering to the NAU and ask which candidate has their finger in that pie.

If Trump wants to get tough, (but not evil)...all he has to do is ask what do the super-donors want. Mercer has a $6B IRS problem. Would Ted, if elected make it go away? Thats a fair question. What shennanigans do Rubio’s Super-donars want?

Trum could hit at the move toward the cash-less society if he wants to create FUD and scare the bejesus out of the electorate. Bring up the spectre of Greece and the plans for the US to create a bali-in program.

Ask if the democrats are National Socialists or International Socialists.

There is a path for Trump...he needs to get off the twitter.

Anyway, good news for Cruz. Remember, the battle is between the Globalists and the Nationalists. In my opinion, with either Cruz or Rubio its the GLobalists. With Trump...he is not a conservative, nor a liberal, but an American. Most Americans have positions that straddle both lines.

This election is a mess once again. I have that feeling of dread. American is being sold down the river and we may have to depend on a flawed blustery showman to stop the sale.


297 posted on 02/02/2016 7:34:39 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Are you a lawyer? Do you have a clue what a birthright is? Or what the word ‘firstborn’ means.


298 posted on 02/02/2016 7:34:56 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt; Electric Graffiti
I have cited (and linked) the law...

The "law" you keep using is a naturalization law, the only kind of law Congress is empowered by the Constitution to enact.

Please do, however, keep using that naturalization law as your erroneous vehicle of choice.

299 posted on 02/02/2016 7:35:19 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
"Cruz was naturalized"

I'm sorry, but you are mistaken. He was not, "naturalized" he was a citizen at birth, by definition, according to the law at the time and circumstance of his birth (natural citizenship).

300 posted on 02/02/2016 7:36:06 PM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-555 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson