Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol
That includes who does and does not need to be naturalized.

Non sequitur.

307 posted on 02/02/2016 7:39:32 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Non sequitur

Don't say that. He might reappear :-)

314 posted on 02/02/2016 7:46:26 PM PST by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
The text in question from Article I Section 8 reads:

To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;

I assert that there is no limitation on that power. If you look at the following clause, there is also no limitation on the authority of Congress over bankruptcy laws.

You then stated that my assertion does not naturally follow the statement. Please explain how you came to that conclusion, or by way of rebuttal, show how Congress is limited by the Constitution in it's authority over all rules of naturalization.

317 posted on 02/02/2016 7:49:17 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson