If you like reliable, cheap power - the engine of our economy - you can keep it; if you like your provider you can keep it.......except when we subsidize green providers and punish fossil fuel providers to "save the environment" - making you ration your use due to cost and supply (because we've destroyed the energy industry - driving costs through the roof through regulations and lawsuits - restricting exploration, production and delivery).
In time, we too can look like Venezuela and their nationalize oil sector - dead in the water.
Hillarypower.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Yeah.
Just go ahead mandate the rules.
Can’t actually install the systems, and the energy “savings” assumptions are bullshiiite, but go ahead and mandate them anyway.
2 posted on
02/02/2016 10:32:34 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
How much population reduction will be required to reach this goal?
Will the White House reduce its energy consumption by 1/3? Operation of Air Force One is - of course - included in the White House energy budget.
3 posted on
02/02/2016 10:34:59 PM PST by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Quit posting garbage from The Hill. Why do you want to disseminate left wing propaganda here?
4 posted on
02/02/2016 10:36:31 PM PST by
BreezyDog
((Trump is the democrat backup plan when Clinton gets indicted...))
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Hillaary won’t be around to see it!
5 posted on
02/02/2016 10:37:23 PM PST by
vette6387
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Yeah, “ more information about buildings’ energy usage and expanded appliance energy labeling” are going to decrease energy waste by one-third — if combined with efficiencies in harnessing the energy of unicorn flatulence and the extraction of electromagnetic power from rainbows.
6 posted on
02/02/2016 10:39:22 PM PST by
Stosh
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Kill the power to all of her houses and al gore’s too..
easy cut.. problem solved. next problem?
7 posted on
02/02/2016 10:40:56 PM PST by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house....)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The proposal ... for states that phase out fuel oil and propane as home heating methods during the winter. Will we still be allowed to burn manure to keep from freezing in the winter? Fortunately Hillary will provide a abundance of it.
And what is wrong with propane? Sure, it is more expensive than plumbed in natural gas, but I've never heard any complaints about it being dirty like coal or fuel oil. Maybe she just doesn't like any fuel you can store locally to keep from being frozen at utility company or government whim.
8 posted on
02/02/2016 10:42:13 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
if she would just stop breathing for a couple of hours...the planet might survive....
9 posted on
02/02/2016 10:42:19 PM PST by
M-cubed
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Oh yeah... now THERE'S a sexy issue to build your campaign on...
11 posted on
02/02/2016 10:48:51 PM PST by
Oberon
(John 12:5-6)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
hey Hillary. How about 30% more honesty in the next 30 days?
12 posted on
02/02/2016 10:53:53 PM PST by
proudpapa
(trusTed!)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
As we are finding out locally...energy conservation and reduced use has the power company restructuring service costs and variable rates for an overall INCREASE in costs. So, where’s the savings, Hil-liar-y?
13 posted on
02/02/2016 10:54:30 PM PST by
Skybird
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Clinton rolls out energy efficiency plan - 1/3 reduction in energy waste in 10 years"
What's she doing to reduce her own energy consumption or will she be exempt as in obamacare.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
“The proposal would save households and businesses $70 billion, or $600 per household, annually if implemented, Clinton’s campaign said, and reduce taxpayer spending on energy in federal buildings by $8 billion”
Bull. The real results if implemented will be more financial costs and less freedom.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Pikers.
Frackers have cut the price of petroleum by 2/3 and the price of natural gas by 80% since 2008.
21 posted on
02/02/2016 11:43:48 PM PST by
AZLiberty
(A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Clinton’s Falcon-900 N506BA (rented)
burns 4 gallons per mile.
part of that fuel burn is excess weight
from the hoist needed to
lift Clinton into the plane.
28 posted on
02/03/2016 3:12:03 AM PST by
RockyTx
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Why don’t we just make energy cheap and stop this zero sum game of trying to squeeze consumers?
30 posted on
02/03/2016 4:07:01 AM PST by
dila813
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Yeah, a Clinton plan will save money. Bwahahaha.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Why do Democrat plans for reducing energy waste always call for ME to spend more money?
36 posted on
02/03/2016 5:32:10 AM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
expand appliance energy labeling as ways to reduce energy consumption.
WTF? Labels on appliances will reduce energy use? I’m sure that each one of us reads the label on our electric toothbrush every time we use it. I’m sure we all sit down at the breakfast table each morning and go through a ritual of reading all of the labels on all electrical appliances in the home so that we know how to use them in an energy saving manner.
WHAT A CROCK OF CRAP! How stupid does she think we are?
37 posted on
02/03/2016 6:34:31 AM PST by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: Cincinatus' Wife; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
40 posted on
02/03/2016 12:40:32 PM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
