[dynoman]

After using dirty status quo politics right out of the chute I have to wonder about “The Plausibility of Ted Cruz”.

[heights]

He won Iowa, the land of Snake Handlers.

[Jim W N]

Whereas Cruz has already survived one collision with Trump. And Cruz has already won a state.

Apparently both are not yet concluded. The second one remains yet to be seen what the final outcome will be after the various appeals are exhausted.

[McGruff]

How abut the honesty of Ted Cruz.

[arthurus]

And so long as that remains the case, no other candidate can claim to be a more likely nominee.

So long as Bush is still officially in the race and the RNC still prefers him that is not true.

[going hot]

Cruz won Iowa, has a few delegates, convincing wipeout of the opposition.

Why are we even having this primary stuff anymore.

Cruz won, it is over.

Polls and about 50 million voters are dumb as a box of rocks for even contemplating any other scenario.

[Dick Bachert]

Put up just hours ago, in this longish (14 minute) TRIFECTA, these three guys pretty much echo my thoughts and rantings of the last few months.
We are in the midst of one of the most revolutionary elections in our lifetime. It could go either way. How it DOES go largely depends on how informed YOU and those around you become between now and November!
In the interests of “diversity”, there’s something in this one to delight or anger everyone.
EITHER WAY, THIS ELECTION WILL START A REVOLUTION!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yy2xvXbxRQ

[Jim Noble]

On one level. I’m sympathetic that the trucons deserve a chance to prove their theory (that it’s possible to elect a trucon President). They’ve been loyal GOP soldiers for a long time.

On the other hand, GGG, the question remains: Where are the 64 EVs going to come from (that Romney didn’t win)?

And, beyond that, suppose a trucon wins 270-268. Do you believe a trucon can govern after such an election?

[VanDeKoik]

"Whereas Cruz has already survived one collision with Trump. And Cruz has already won a state. No other candidate can make either boast. And so long as that remains the case, no other candidate can claim to be a more likely nominee."



So the guy with a one delegate lead, with 49 other states to go....

And the NY Times actually printed something so irrationally retarded that people on FR agree with it?

[napscoordinator]

Stealing is Cruz’s name.

By the way, Wednesday he won’t be able to claim he is the only one to win a state.

[doldrumsforgop]

My gut tells me watch how the libs react and let that be your guide on who to vote for.

In this case, they reserve their greatest hate for Cruz.

One may not believe in God, but you can bet the devil sure believes in Him.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2016/02/03/crushing-cruz-medias-worst-attacks-gop-presidential-candidate

[The Toll]

Ted Cruz is my favorite politician. I will vote for him if he gets the nomination even though he is no longer my first choice. It won’t matter though, he won’t win, and even if he did the destruction of the country through both legal and illegal immigration would continue unabated. He is a very “principled conservative” and I am now convinced that the highest conservative principle is unfettered access to cheap foreign labor.