Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman
Wasn't the issue that she had and used an unauthorized server in the first place regardless of how "top secret" any of the info was?

No. That is her narrative and she says it was ok but bad in retrospect and apologized. The more serious problem is that she told someone to send classified information on an unclassified system (authorized or not). In one case "If they can't [get secure fax working]," Clinton replies, "turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure." If that material was classified she would be directing someone to commit a crime. In many other cases she had to know that the material she was forwarding was classified. There was an email released the fall (can't find it now) where she also directed the release of classified information.

7 posted on 02/07/2016 5:49:43 AM PST by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

” ....email released the fall (can’t find it now)...” LOL! I’m sure julian assange has a copy. But, yeah I know and understand what you’re saying about the classification and telling your peeps to remove the headers and send it anyway. Had we even considered doing anything like that when I was working..............BOOM! Lost job and possible criminal charges. And it wouldn’t take two years to put a case together either.


10 posted on 02/07/2016 5:54:40 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson