Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong

Doesn’t change the requirements for President. If it did, it would have been written.


53 posted on 02/07/2016 9:24:38 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau
No I am not saying it did change the requirements for President. I was just referring you to the Naturalization Act of 1790 in my earlier post, which talked about children born to citizens living in a foreign country at the time of the child's birth.

However, see the post by Whisky-X Post # 39 According to what he has posted Ted Cruz is a naturalized, not a "natural born", citizen per the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952.

I still believe there is enough in question about what constitutes a "natural born" citizen for there to be a Supreme Court ruling. However, with the makeup of the Court I shudder to think how that will come out, for it might include anchor babies as being deemed "natural born" citizens. I wish this had happened before so many liberals were placed onto the court.

60 posted on 02/07/2016 9:55:57 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson