Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/07/2016 7:52:26 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Never fall in love with an asset. Had a small interest in an East Texas well. At the height of the boom in East Texas, a company approached me on the buyout of my interest. I ran the income numbers and the amount of oil to come online in the next few years. Grabbed the money and ran. Well value fell tremendously with the collapse of oil prices. One of the best decisions I ever made.


2 posted on 02/07/2016 7:57:22 AM PST by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Back to reality.


4 posted on 02/07/2016 7:59:58 AM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Oil was overpriced under the belief that supply was declining, fracking in the US showed that to be incorrect. Prices declined to $70/bbl or so, then the Saudis ramped up production to drive US suppliers out of business, and prices have declined further, $30/bbl or less. Once these US suppliers are largely offline, supply will tighten and the price will rise once again. It remains to be seen, how quickly things can ramp back up again in the US, but that should cap the increase and it won’t be over $100. Financial challenges due to prior defaults might hamper that ramping back up again, though.


5 posted on 02/07/2016 8:00:29 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Rather lengthy but informative as hell.


6 posted on 02/07/2016 8:06:55 AM PST by szweig (HYHEY!! (Have You Had Enough Yet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Well, duh. Same cycle every ten years since 1820 and the author is surprised?


7 posted on 02/07/2016 8:07:17 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I don’t see it as wealth destruction, but wealth shifting, from the owners of oil to the consumers of oil.


8 posted on 02/07/2016 8:21:31 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Prendre cinq et rendre quatre ce n'est pas donner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Last Tuesday I bought a half-case of beer. I paid $14 bucks for it and I bet all I could get for the empties is 25 cents. That’s $13.75 up in smoke (or down the drain, depending on how you look at it).


9 posted on 02/07/2016 8:22:48 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

That $100T is the market’s estimate of the net present value of the reduction in the income stream that would have flowed into energy producers’ pockets if prices had maintained their high levels.

Symmetrically, that’s a conservative estimate of the net present value of the money that consumers will have available to spend on things other than energy. Let the party begin!


12 posted on 02/07/2016 10:27:11 AM PST by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson