Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hulka

The crime is that “equal protection” has been turned into the de facto ERA amendment. Why did the left ever want an ERA amendment if everything they needed was already in the Constitution? Phyllis Schafly said the ERA would mean women being drafted and same-sex marriage would be made legal. Now the court has made “equal protection” mean the same thing as the ERA. Which opens up everything Schafly warned would happen if the ERA was passed.


57 posted on 02/08/2016 2:57:32 PM PST by JediJones (Marco Rubio: When the Establishment Says Jump, He Asks How High?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

Thing is, reading the Congressional Record of the debate over the 14th Amendment, it was all about granting freed slaves equal rights. Nothing more.


65 posted on 02/08/2016 3:27:24 PM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson