Replies

To: knarf

Their record for predicting winners is spotty at best.

2 posted on 02/08/2016 8:53:16 PM PST by Larry Lucido

To: Larry Lucido

So far, the link doesn't work

Yeah, I know about their record ... but things are different this year ...

We'll see

5 posted on 02/08/2016 8:55:43 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)

To: Larry Lucido; knarf

From this thread: Kasich beats Trump 3-2. Do all the candidates drop by there at least once?

160 posted on 02/08/2016 11:05:20 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)

To: Larry Lucido

Yet they are the first to vote, that is what is important.

196 posted on 02/09/2016 3:08:29 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)

To: Larry Lucido

Their record for predicting winners is spotty at best.

Red Hampshire's record for predicting 'winners' is spotty, at best. They are the attention whore of primary states.

197 posted on 02/09/2016 3:13:51 AM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794