In other words, will she do the honorable thing? Don’t hold your breath.
The Founders did the best they could, but ultimately corruption takes over, as it’s doing now.
In the past two thousand years, how often have governments voluntarily surrendered power back to the people?
She’ll do as she is told and like it.
Is this a serious article?
Of course not.
Does a bear drop Obama likenesses in the woods?
What a joke. She will sit there and hear the case. Does anyone actually think they are hung up on quaint rules?
We are like some old fashioned boxer following the rules squared off against some crazed cage death match champion MMA lunatic.
The very idea of the article is silly. Since when does that side follow ANY rule or tradition?
Of course not.
No, she will not.
Erickson & Leon Wolf fired Daniel Horowitz for his views on amnesty & “starving brown people”
Why should she?
The liberal “justices” have never recused themselves from anything, anywhere, and nobody ever, ever calls them on it.
Never.
She is never, ever going to take herself out of anything, and only fools and idiots think she will.
the real question is should there still be a president Obama?
Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over a homosexual ‘marriage’ before sitting on the Obergefell case that forced so many to recognize homosexual ‘marriage’ as a Constitutional right. She never considered recusing herself in that case.
So no, it is likely Sotomayor will not recuse herself.
This case is a big deal, much more so than any state primary. But it’s unfortunately being kept under the media radar:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3395091/posts?page=3#3
Did she recuse herself on homosexual “marriage”?
When did Horowitz start doing standup routines?