Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe
YUP. That's why Ted Cruz crushed Trump amongst evangelicals and conservatives in Iowa, but didn't in New Hampshire,

Trump dominated with "very conservative" and "conservative" voters in New Hampshire, whose numbers were actually up this year compared to the previous election. Trump dominated 35 percent to 23 percent for the 25 percent of "very conservative" voters. Trump dominated even more with those who only described themselves as conservative or slightly conservative. All in all, "conservative" voters represented nearly 70 percent of primary voters, and Trump dominated each category.

As for your, "they're not really conservatives!" Your assertion is stupid, because it means that the "very conservative" group, which was Cruz's only strong group, were all liberals voting for Cruz.

170 posted on 02/10/2016 4:40:45 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
Again that's New Hampshire. In Iowa Cruz crushed Trump amongst evangelicals and conservatives.

Again Iowa and South Carolina have vastly more conservatives and evangelicals than New Hampshire. Again New Hampshire is the least religious state in the entire country. Again New Hampshire is the 5th most liberal state in the country. Again Ted Cruzcame 3rd after spending just $580K vs. $32M for Bush, who came 4th, and over $10 million spent by Rubio who came 5th.
Again Ted Cruz has a better ground game in South Carolina than anyone else. Again Ted Cruz has more cash on hand than Jeb, Rubio, Kasic and Christie combined.

179 posted on 02/10/2016 4:59:34 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson