Posted on 02/10/2016 9:20:33 AM PST by dmzTahoe
Three words that will silence Rubio and Cruz and dramatically contrast Mr. Trump's strength to the Senatots' weakness...
When Mr. Trump is debating, and the establishment Senators (Cruz and Rubio) start proudly saying what they have done in "leading" the fight against this or that, or pushing this or that legislation, I wish Mr Trump would look at them in the eyes and say...
"That's very noble of you to lead the fight, Senator, but tell me something about those efforts... DID YOU WIN? It's one thing to fight for something, but if you don't win, you are a loser. America doesn't need a loser. America needs someone who wins. And that's not you, Senator."
DID YOU WIN?
Marco: "I led the fight against..."
Trump: "Did you win?"
Cruz: "I stood in the Senate and led the fight against..."
Trump: "Did you win?"
Trump is a proven winner. What have Cruz and Rubio won? America will note the difference
Election won.
Cruz: “In your four failed business ventures where you declared bankruptcy, did you win?”
Trump: “yes, those who financed them, trusted and supported me lost, though”
I have one for you. Saturday night debate, Cruz turns to donnie and asks:
Can you explain to the American people why you called me a P****?
(Do you remember Cruz said waterboarding was enhanced interrogation - NOT torture, and torture too many problems at low levels,should only only be done at highest levels approved by highest levels).
No,of course not. DT pretended Cruz was against waterboarding.
If you don’t understand the basic difference between owning stock in and WORKING FOR Goldman Sachs...then this statement isn’t worth the screen you typed this on....
Your mindless campaign bot behavior around here renders your comments on any campaign issue an absurd waste of time to rational people.
They weren’t my comments. They were quotes from Rush Limbaugh and Jeff Sessions.
And she said no.
And then Atlantic City Condemned her house thru eminent domain.
And you think that Trump didn't have a hand in that?
So Cruz is the “establishment” now?
Keep it up Trumpsters, you may be the only ones voting for Trump in the fall. You won’t need the Cruz or any other candidate’s followers.
Read the whole story on this thing, Trump was not the only developer in this.
WINNER
"In addition to his success in Heller, Cruz successfully defended the constitutionality of the Ten Commandments monument on the Texas State Capitol grounds before the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court, winning 5–4 in Van Orden v. Perry."
WINNER
"In 2004, Cruz was involved in the high-profile case, Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow,[40][44] in which he wrote a brief on behalf of all 50 states which argued that the plaintiff did not have standing to file suit on behalf of his daughter.[58] The Supreme Court upheld the position of Cruz’s brief."
WINNER
"Cruz served as lead counsel for the state and successfully defended the multiple litigation challenges to the 2003 Texas congressional redistricting plan in state and federal district courts and before the U.S. Supreme Court, which was decided 5–4 in his favor in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry"
WINNER
LAST BUT NOT LEAST
"Cruz also successfully defended, in Medellin v. Texas, the State of Texas against an attempt to re-open the cases of 51 Mexican nationals, all of whom were convicted of murder in the United States and were on death row.[40][44][46][53] With the support of the George W. Bush Administration, the petitioners argued that the United States had violated the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by failing to notify the convicted nationals of their opportunity to receive legal aid from the Mexican consulate.[49][60] They based their case on a decision of the International Court of Justice in the Avena case which ruled that by failing to allow access to the Mexican consulate, the US had breached its obligations under the Convention.[61] Texas won the case in a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court holding that ICJ decisions were not binding in domestic law and that the President had no power to enforce them>"
WINNER
Cruz has been named by American Lawyer magazine as one of the 50 Best Litigators under 45 in America,[52][62] by The National Law Journal as one of the 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America,[63][64] and by Texas Lawyer as one of the 25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century
The above taken from: TED CRUZ
Interview of Donald Trump & Ivanka.
"Ivanka what do you have in common with your father?" Answer: "Real estate and golf"
"Trump, what do you have in common with Ivanka?" Answer: "SEX"
Paraphrase: If Ivanka wasn't my daughter I would probably be dating her.
There is no getting around this is just plain sick the things he says about his DAUGHTER.
I do not want a personality that will do what it takes to win his ideology.
I want a leader that will do what it takes to preserve the US Constitution.
If the ideology-concept matches the preservation-concept. THAT is who I will vote for. I’m also willing to support someone who will establish “steps” to preserve the Constitution but, the next “goomer” must be willing to carry on the efforts.
All they need to ask Trump about Sharpton is “do you still financially support him and his organization?”
Trump cannot come close to Cruz in understanding and debating the issues, but he sure beats anyone and everyone at blowhard bluster. Browbeats them, that is! Alas, 7 years of Obama have turned his enemies into children.
Cruz: You wanted to take an old woman’s house from her to build a parking lot. Did you win?
Trump offered 1.9 million for a house that her Heirs could only get $ 500,000 for when she died.
Heir kin lost $1.4 million because she turned down a deal that would have left her Heirs millionaires.
She shafted her family.
Trump: Why is your wife working for Goldman Sachs for $750K?
Pray America wakes
No Mr. Trump all the democrats you helped get elected stopped me from winning.
This comment here is the winner.
Trump is running on his business acumen. His bankruptcies matter.
Cruz establishment? What are you smoking? There has never been a more anti establishment running for President. You trumpbots are as much in the ozone as obamabots were and still are. I am beginning to think they are the same people...
Trump... Probably shouldn’t bring up the subject of marriage.
IN BRIEF; Follow-Ups: Judge Rejects Property Seizure . . Published: July 26, 1998
An elderly widow whose home was being condemned so that Donald Trump could expand one of his casinos hit the jackpot last week when a judge threw out the eminent domain cases against her and owners of two other properties. (The use of eminent domain by Atlantic City casinos was the subject of a cover article, ''What Public? What Use?'' by Laura Mansnerus, on March 22.)
Superior Court Judge Richard Williams said the state's plan to seize the parcels for an expansion of Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino was flawed because it set no limits on what Mr. Trump could do once he obtained the land.
Mr. Trump had said the land would be used for a park, a parking lot and a limousine waiting area.
Lawyers for Vera Coking; Clare and Vincent Sabatini, restaurateurs, and Josef Banin, owner of a jewelry store, called the plan a ruse to allow Mr. Trump to avoid paying market value for the land.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.