Posted on 02/10/2016 9:09:58 PM PST by Amntn
Heidi Cruz misstated her husband's vote on a key and controversial trade provision last year in a radio interview this week.
The issue of trade has become a hot one for both parties this cycle. Donald Trump's made the case that the United States is getting screwed on free trade -- that U.S. policies have ruined the wages for the American worker.
In a radio interview on South Carolina's Vince Coakley Radio Program, Heidi Cruz argued free trade is a powerfully good force and that presidents should have increased powers to negotiate trade deals -- a policy that has become particularly controversial over the last year as President Obama has pushed for what's called trade-promotion authority (TPA) to negotiate a U.S.-Asian Pacific trade agreement.
And then she said Ted Cruz voted for TPA. Sen. Cruz, while initially voting for TPA in May of 2015, was one of only five Republicans to vote against it when it came up for another vote in the Senate later that June. At the time, Cruz explained that his reversal was a result of his opposition to the Export-Import Bank and new immigration provisions introduced by the House.
A Cruz spokesman told BuzzFeed News: "Cruz supports free trade but voted against TPA because he did not want President Obama to have the authority to unilaterally make bad trade deals."
Here's Heidi Cruz's case for free trade:
"Well Ted is a free trader, he's always been a free trader, and that is why he voted for the Trade Promotion Authority in Congress. That being said, what is--and the reason he is for free trade is because it creates American jobs. We've done a study on the campaign as to how many jobs free trade has created for various states in the country, and the numbers are in the hundreds of thousands depending on the size of the state. And so I'd encourage your listeners to look at those types of statistics. Free trade creates jobs for Americans. Ted has integrated into his tax plan a tax break for exports so that companies that producing for export will not be taxed in the U.S. which gives them any advantage in selling abroad.
"The second thing, though, and equally important, they must go part and parcel, is that we must be negotiating the right free trade agreements that are good for America and not bad for America. And this president has not proven that he's able to do so, and so Ted voted against the TPP, the deal with Asia. And the reason he voted against it is, he actually goes and reads the bills that he votes on and the agreements that are negotiated. Ted went down into the SCIF, he read through the pages of this agreement. He made the observation that this was not a good agreement for America. This president is not negotiating good deals for our country, there are immigration things in there. There are things that don't belong in there, and he voted against that agreement.
"Let me remind you listeners that the trade promotion authority for the bill that gives Congress the right to give to executive branch the ability to negotiate trade on the behalf of the country. This is a six year lasting situation, so in the Constitution the authority for trade is given to the Congress, but because of all the different interests, it was deemed a long time ago that the executive should argue on behalf of the American people, but that Congress should approve or disapprove. And this lasts for six years, and so if we deny the ability for our executive to negotiate trade agreements on our behalf, and then be reviewed by Congress --which should be a very assiduous process -- we will be also denying the next president because this president only has just about eight months left in office."
Great Read!
Bookmarked for the hard-of-thinking : )
Rafael Edward (Ted) Cruz is No Constitutional Conservative
“The interviewer then asked him if he would give TPA (fast track) to Obama, and Cruz answers, “I support Fast Track, yes.”
The entire purpose of fast-track is for Congress to surrender its power to the Executive for six years.”
http://www.capitolhilloutsider.com/rafael-edward-ted-cruz-is-no-constitutional-conservative/
Great find. Please keep posting this for the HOT’s.
Cruz has vigorously fought to open up markets to entry by anyone with the talent and desire to compete on a level playing field.
Coincidentally (/snix), economic libertarianism also fits into the far-out Dominionist teachings Cruz/s father preaches.
The elder Cruz preaches to Dominionist audiences and tells the congregation that Rev 5:10 teaches that Christians are divided into Kings and Priests,.....the kings (politicians) go out and conquer the financial world and bring the money back to the priests (pastors in contemporary terms).
Cruz/s dad has a goofy and weird history. He claims he was
ordained by some random church, went to a Bible college
that doesn/t exist, and that he is a Pastor who doesn/t
actually have a church.
When he takes a position on something like TPP, Cruz proceeds to educate everyone on the subject... Bless his heart, it/s nice of Cruz to remind us how smart he is......He obviously believes we/re too dumb to know.
LET US PRAY Lord deliver us from the delusional Harvard-educated Ivy League mind.
BTW, Sen Ivy League/s greatest accomplishment, to date? He duped trusting Texans into voting a Canadian into the US Senate.
” Coincidentally (/snix), economic libertarianism also fits into the far-out Dominionist teachings Cruz/s father preaches.
The elder Cruz preaches to Dominionist audiences and tells the congregation that Rev 5:10 teaches that Christians are divided into Kings and Priests,.....the kings (politicians) go out and conquer the financial world and bring the money back to the priests (pastors in contemporary terms). “
I prefer the Coincidentally (/snix), economic libertarianism also fits into the far-out Dominionist teachings Cruz/s father preaches.
The elder Cruz preaches to Dominionist audiences and tells the congregation that Rev 5:10 teaches that Christians are divided into Kings and Priests,.....the kings (politicians) go out and conquer the financial world and bring the money back to the priests (pastors in contemporary terms). “
I belive in The Phenomenology of The Great Boston Cream Pie......Don’t tell ME a pie can’t have consciousness! (Only kidding I belong to a non-denominational conservative Christian church that actually studies the Bible, and we don’t try to “fix” it)
“LET US PRAY Lord deliver us from the delusional Harvard-educated Ivy League mind. “ AND any lawyers!!!!
He has never given any indication he would be in favor of giving up our independence.
Ainât gonna happen.
.........................................................
It has already happened. He supported cloture on TPA. That’s all it took.
Well said.
They are PRIMARY PROOF that Cruz is a one world order freetrader. American SOVEREIGNTY is his last concern.
For the moment China is not signed on to TPP. How would that change things, make them better, or make them worse if China did sign on?
I don’t think it much matters. The US has gotten the shaft on every one of these “free trade” deals in the last 40 years. I read yesterday that Ford was moving a lot of production to Mexico. I wonder what we get in return? More Mexican illegals? Thanks NAFTA.
“American SOVEREIGNTY is his last concern.”
And it’s my FIRST!
It’s just funny to watch people railing about NAFTA and globalism twist themselves into pretzels about Ronald Reagan. Very amusing.
Oops, didn’t do my homework thoroughly on this one. I stand corrected. But I’m not voting for Cruz because he’s perfect. He’s a politician, after all.
2. Club For Growth fervently supports TPP. (Club For Growth site)
3. Club For Growth has (so far) donated over $700,000 to the Cruz campaign. (Open Secrets site)
Don't forget what NAFTA did to us:
NAFTA was simply economic permission to crush U.S. tariffs, so huge companies could produce products overseas for embarrassingly low wages and then import the pieces back into the U.S. either whole or for assembly, without paying previously-imposed tariffs. Wages and environmental regulations were laughable, though many companies have now fled Mexico in favor of even lower wages and virtually no pollution standards in third-world countries.
Which party is Heidi running in so I can make sure not to vote for her
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.