Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

Eminent domain has historically been used for a public use, not a private use. Roads, railroads, and pipelines are public uses. A wall to secure the border would be a public use.

Condemning a neighbor’s property so I can use it for a swimming pool and picnic area is not a public use and should not be allowed under eminent domain. Condemning private property so I can put in an auto parts store is not a public use.

You get the distinction.


66 posted on 02/11/2016 5:20:55 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SharpRightTurn

The question isn’t whether we get it, does Cruz get it? And the answer is, no.


69 posted on 02/11/2016 5:22:51 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson