Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner
When one of these hits the aluminum superstructure of a modern warship at Mach 3.5, that warhead is there to just ignite the vaporized aluminum.

Exactly what I have been telling the "CIWS rules" idiots for years here. Mach 3+ buckshot on an aluminum superstructure means you are dead.

Yeah, you hit it, now what about that load of shrapnel coming at you?

18 posted on 02/11/2016 9:56:14 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: doorgunner69

You mean the shrapnel falling into the water? Not a dammed thing.

And if, if the intercept was so close that shrapnel impacted the ship, it’s energy is already dissipated or never reached a maxima sine the warhead would detonate low order.

It might leave scorch marks on the hull. That’s about it. Scrub and repaint. Next!


36 posted on 02/12/2016 4:04:04 AM PST by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: doorgunner69

You make a very bad assumption about the physics of impacts. If the CIWS impacts the munition, it will, at an absolute minima, interrupt its flight path. Probably causing the munition to tumble.

Typically, the hit is so catastrophic that the fuze assembly is disable or damaged... no boom: But the possibility of a kinetic hit still. But then you have the whole interrupted flight path again.

And at supersonic speeds, tumbling leads to rapid, less than 250 milliseconds, disintegration.

There are some pretty good YouTube videos that show what happens to a supersonic body that gets clipped. It’s over quickly.

Does this mean that the ship survives unscathed? No. Does it mean it’s out of the fight? No.


37 posted on 02/12/2016 4:11:15 AM PST by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: doorgunner69

That would be true if the incoming missile flew true after being hit, but I suspect that the flight profile might go a bit askew after it is no longer even close to being symmetrical.


38 posted on 02/12/2016 4:14:10 AM PST by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson