Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

MSM continue to cover up truth to help Hillary Clinton.
1 posted on 02/12/2016 3:40:49 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: detective

Money train stops when you go against the hag and her team


2 posted on 02/12/2016 3:44:12 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

There’s an outside chance that many of her constituents will see through it this time around. The woman is bad news; pure evil.


3 posted on 02/12/2016 3:44:38 AM PST by ransacked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Crap house PBS needs to have it’s funding cut off!


4 posted on 02/12/2016 3:46:27 AM PST by Mr Apple (google: JEFFREY EPSTEIN BILL 'TWITCHIN' HANDS CLINTON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Any “debate” already has its marching orders. Try to destroy every Republican. Enhance every Democratic. Especially a minority socialist.


5 posted on 02/12/2016 4:00:59 AM PST by Kudsman (Beware the disruptors! Are they REALLY supporting a candidate, or are they gop-e or rat operatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The Four elephants in the room PBS couldn’t see .

1) Bengazi

2) eMail server

3) Classified documents

4) Bribing Reporters


6 posted on 02/12/2016 4:02:47 AM PST by Lionheartusa1 ()-: ISIS is Islam without the lipstick :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Clinton —> Scandals —> PBS = NOTHING BURGER.

Funny thing, some even here expected a Big Mac and did not even get a Whopper. Just a Nothing Burger.


7 posted on 02/12/2016 4:03:45 AM PST by Tupelo (Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

If PBS didn’t not mention something, then it did not happen or does not exist. Attempting to mention that oversight to any liberal/socialist will only elicit cries of outrage at suggesting such a slander to be followed by tears and personal attacks.

Like:
“HRC is as honest as the day is long and her email is none of anybody’s business - so there you vile racist, woman-hating pig!”


8 posted on 02/12/2016 4:07:24 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Breathtakingly obvious isn’t it?

There is no mainstream journalism in the nation anymore.
Maybe there never was and freedom of the press was just another government lie


9 posted on 02/12/2016 4:07:25 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Compare the media interest in Clinton’s clear breach of national security, vs. Christie’s bridge closing fiasco.


13 posted on 02/12/2016 4:29:36 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Who was it that said something about “a willing suspension of disbelief”?


15 posted on 02/12/2016 4:33:38 AM PST by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

“We can’t discuss that, because it’s under investigation...”

The trick is to keep everything under constant investigation.


16 posted on 02/12/2016 4:50:17 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

No surprise.

Although I did not watch the debate, I used to watch some of the PBS ‘news’ and political discussions. They were not much different than the network news in their political leanings and preferences.

==

Turned on Fox&Friends for the morning headlines. Geraldo and Judge Jeanine were going at it over the Hillary email scandal. Care to take a guess as which one was defending Hillary and claiming the ‘scandal’ was much about nothing?


19 posted on 02/12/2016 5:21:39 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

PBS stands for Propaganadists / Brazen Satanists.

At this stage of the game, I’m surprised they don’t run false reports that Clinton was cleared of all suspicion for everything ever in eternity.


21 posted on 02/12/2016 6:22:13 AM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

22 posted on 02/12/2016 6:27:00 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
Why should they have honest debates?

Liberal elites are too good for that kind of thing... besides the fix is in...

Democrat elites pick who will run with their 'superdelegates'... they've never trusted 'the will of the people'... liberal elites hate the great unwashed - except as props in their scams.

24 posted on 02/12/2016 11:27:03 AM PST by GOPJ (Allowing illegals to stay is like paying ransom to terrorists - incentivized insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The problem for them is social media which bypasses the censorship.


25 posted on 02/12/2016 12:01:06 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

It’s just not newsworthy. Geez.


27 posted on 02/12/2016 11:08:53 PM PST by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson