Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armed Social Security Recipients are Now Targeted by Obama
Freedom Outpost ^ | 2/10/2016 | Tim Brown

Posted on 02/12/2016 5:04:14 AM PST by HomerBohn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: LambSlave

“”knee jerk FR reaction””

Knee jerk reaction on FR? Surely, you jest!!!

Thanks for checking it out more.


41 posted on 02/12/2016 6:17:02 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimbug

Not an autopsy, Goulish!

He’s still be alive, but without anesthetic.


42 posted on 02/12/2016 6:25:12 AM PST by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Social Security Administration recipients who have a representative payee have not been deemed “mentally incompetent.” That is not a legal term recognized in federal law as it relates to prohibitions against acquiring or possessing firearms.
The federal prohibitions against acquiring or possessing firearms apply to those “adjudicated as a mental defective.”

Under the proposed new policy, individuals who have representative payees would lose the right to possess any guns they might currently own and would be prohibited from purchasing new firearms. (This is being pursued as new policy by Obama. Anyone who, for whatever reason receiving disability benefits who has a representative payee/trustee of sorts will have his./her guns taken!!!)

The term “adjudication,” refers to a determination made after a judicial-type process that includes various due process protections. In no case does the federal law describe or contemplate the type of prohibition by bureaucratic fiat exercised by the SSA in developing its guidelines for those with “representative payees” assigned to their accounts.


43 posted on 02/12/2016 6:26:25 AM PST by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

“”I have never heard of it either, but I am under the age of 65.””

My only advice to you is “STOP AND SMELL THE ROSES” so there will be more joy to growing old than making/keeping more doctor appointments than you ever did in all the other years added together. My husband and I retired at 70, relocated and the last 10 years have been a steady parade to/from doctors and hospitals. Before that, we saw doctors once a year for physicals and myself for the usual female checkups.

We were too conservative to enjoy the opportunities we had to have some fun. So listen well!!!!!!


44 posted on 02/12/2016 6:29:53 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Nah-But “O” is not convinced yet that we know just how f%#@ed up he IS-So he’s trying to get it across to us (satire)


45 posted on 02/12/2016 6:57:53 AM PST by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Someone tell Clair Wolff that we’ve passed that awkward time...


46 posted on 02/12/2016 7:02:59 AM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Our local Cabela’s is having GREAT DEALS on handguns this week.

I’m trying to find ways to cut my bills so I can STOCK UP before I really get old and senile!
“I wants one of them, one of them, two of them, oh yea, one of them!” CHARGE IT!


47 posted on 02/12/2016 7:05:37 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

They mean SSI,not basic SS.

The article,like many on The Web,is misleading.

It’s all bull anyway.

.


48 posted on 02/12/2016 7:06:41 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

“applies to people receiving SS benefits who have a “representative payee”; e.g. people who have acknowledged that they are not mentally competent to manage their own affairs and have asked/had someone else appointed to manage their finances”... I would also think they should also be declared ineligible to vote.


49 posted on 02/12/2016 7:12:23 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
I'm not too sure that it is a good idea to be messing with "gun totin' crazy old people who don't have that much to loose, anyway".

Maybe all you high & mighty lawyers, bureaucrats & central planners might want to rethink this idea, hmmmm?


50 posted on 02/12/2016 9:08:39 AM PST by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
appointing a representative payee is *not* equivalent to being adjudicated mentally incompetent.

Exactly!

I'll guarantee that most of Congress, the chattering class and the Hollywood elite have 'financial managers' to handle their incoming checks!

(ooops, bad example. Most of the above ARE 'mentally incompetent'!)

51 posted on 02/12/2016 9:18:50 AM PST by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

You mean, aside from both being an infringement upon an inalienable Right?

***

I note they don’t go after the one area where old age *does* play a detriment to the safety of the public at large...DRIVING.

IMO, it’s been asinine to allow licenses to be so easily re-issued after age 65 (I’m just throwing a # out there). Can’t see over the wheel, confuse gas w/ the brakes, 40MPH in the passing lane of the hwy, etc.


52 posted on 02/12/2016 9:39:20 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I’m not over 65, but lying to (denouncing and not cooperating with) Satan is not a sin.


53 posted on 02/12/2016 2:07:10 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HockeyPop

From what source did you copy this from?

It has those crazy, worthless symbols indicating that the text hasn’t been washed.

(Furthermore, when is this website going to correct this problem? Many of us contribute good money to the maintenance of Free Republic.)


54 posted on 02/12/2016 2:34:18 PM PST by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
Just remember on Election Day that the evil Democrat Communist Party has stood beside THEIR chosen president each step of his way to destroy America.

So have many so called Conservative Republicans.

55 posted on 02/13/2016 7:01:31 AM PST by itsahoot (1st impression. Trump is a fumble mouthed blowhard that can't speak in complete sentences. VoteTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

In the entire Congress you will find only five true Conservatives.

I am happy in my choice to be a ‘far right wing conspirator’.


56 posted on 02/13/2016 7:53:15 AM PST by HomerBohn (Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Can’t recall. May have been from the NRA or an email I received.


57 posted on 02/13/2016 4:55:14 PM PST by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson